PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETEngagementPET in the news: findings about genome editing from PET's report covered in the Guardian

Engagement

PET in the news: findings about genome editing from PET's report covered in the Guardian

Published 22 June 2022
Image by Matthew Daniels via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts human cells, showing the stages of cell division.
CC BY 4.0

We were delighted that the Guardian’s science editor, Ian Sample, chose to write about PET’s findings on public attitudes to genome editing under the headline ‘Half in UK back genome editing to prevent severe diseases’.

John Harris, emeritus professor of bioethics at the University of Manchester, is quoted saying he supported 'maximum possible choice' for parents in choosing the physical traits of their children if the traits in themselves are not harmful.

NHS funding for fertility treatment was also covered. There is a quote from PET's Report from Professor Alison Murdoch, president of the British Fertility Society, who said, 'IVF is now a routine procedure, so why doesn’t the NHS give everyone a chance?'

« PET on the airwaves: Times Radio's Breakfast Show

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon
BECOME A

Friend of PET

Please support us. Help us remain an independent voice informing patient choice – become a Friend of PET.

Become a Friend
Tweets by PET_BioNews

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856