PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentDebating genetic susceptibility tests

BioNews

Debating genetic susceptibility tests

Published 18 June 2009 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 183

Author

Juliet Tizzard

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.

During 2002, the issue of over the counter genetic susceptibility tests has been in and out of the news. Back in March, we reported on a campaign to stop one company selling genetic susceptibility tests through a high street chain of shops. Then over the summer, the government advisory group...

During 2002, the issue of over the counter genetic susceptibility tests has been in and out of the news. Back in March, we reported on a campaign to stop one company selling genetic susceptibility tests through a high street chain of shops. Then over the summer, the government advisory group, the Human Genetics Commission (HGC), published a public consultation on the issue, asking for suggestions on how (if at all) to regulate such tests.

Most people would agree that genetic tests which provide information for the individual and their families relating to serious disease should continue to be offered in a medical setting. The implications of such test results are significant and it is important that their meaning can be properly explained to patients.


But what about genetic tests which do not give information about a serious disease relevant to an individual and their family? Some tests, looking for a particular variation in a person's DNA, could give information about how their body handles alcohol or other toxins or whether they are at increased risk of skin cancer. Is a medical practitioner required to explain the implications of such a test or could information and advice be provided by a third party such as a dietician or a pharmacist? One important question is whether tests of this kind provide meaningful information that tells consumers something they didn't already know. Some people have expressed concern that those who take a test, but are shown to be at no greater risk, will be encouraged to pursue a sedentary lifestyle, assuming themselves to be immune from heart disease or even cancer. But are these fears exaggerated? And do they patronise the public and underestimate their ability to make sensible decisions?


There have been few opportunities to go beyond the headlines and debate genetic susceptibility tests in public. However on Wednesday evening, Progress Educational Trust is hosting a debate in London on the implications of genetic susceptibility tests. Although the HGC consultation is now closed, the commission is still interested to hear public and professional views before it reports to ministers at the end of the year. There are still places available for the debate, so if you want to take part in the discussion or even influence the direction of policy, reserve a place by replying to this email or signing up at http://www.progress.org.uk/events. Those of you who are unable to attend will be able to read a write up on our website.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« IVF mix-ups not endemic

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Recent
27 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Thirty years of PET: our 'Fertility, Genomics and Embryo Research' report

27 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Children's rights and donor conception: What next?

20 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

The problems with lifting donor anonymity earlier

20 June 2022 • 6 minutes read

An adaptive act: How should human fertilisation and embryology legislation respond to scientific and technological change?

13 June 2022 • 1 minute read

A new look for BioNews

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856