PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentFrozen embryo mix-up is not a disaster for IVF

BioNews

Frozen embryo mix-up is not a disaster for IVF

Published 18 June 2009 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 76

Author

Juliet Tizzard

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

This week's news that a number of frozen embryos stored in two UK IVF clinics have gone missing could be a disaster for the couples involved. If the embryos don't turn up Ð which they may well do Ð those couples will have to start their IVF treatment from scratch if they...

This week's news that a number of frozen embryos stored in two UK IVF clinics have gone missing could be a disaster for the couples involved. If the embryos don't turn up - which they may well do - those couples will have to start their IVF treatment from scratch if they want to have another go at conceiving. Another IVF cycle means more drugs, more waiting and hoping and probably more expense. Whilst a clinic at fault in this way will no doubt offer free treatment as recompense, the undertaking of another round of IVF is certainly no fun, especially for the woman involved.

But whilst this fiasco may be a disaster for the couples and the clinics concerned, it should not be seen as a disaster for IVF or for embryo freezing, despite many commentators' attempts to tell us so.


First up was Anne Atkins in the Mail on Sunday. According to Ms Atkins, 'the artificial creation and freezing of embryos is unnatural; it is subject to human endeavour - and subject to human frailty'. And then came a spokesman for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, who in true I-told-you-so fashion said 'we object to turning human procreation into a lab process. Part of the reason is on the grounds of the inevitable mishaps that occur'.


These commentators are, to a greater or lesser degree, opponents of IVF and embryo freezing. So it comes a no surprise that they would leap on an apparent human error to bolster their objection to the whole process. But their criticisms are dishonest.


If this error were really as inevitable as is suggested, why hasn't it happened before? In the UK, over 250,000 embryos have been stored so that patients could use them for further treatment, yet this - terrible as it is - is the first instance of a mistake. Mix-ups with embryos are no more inevitable than switched babies in maternity wards or the wrong patient having an appendix removed. Does this mean that hospital deliveries or appendectomies were foolhardy developments just waiting to fail? Of course not. It means that when the stakes are high, hospitals should check, check and check again.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Secrets and lies in sperm donation

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Recent
4 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Widening the debate about direct-to-consumer genetic testing and donor conception

4 July 2022 • 3 minutes read

Join PET and Genomics England to celebrate the 200th birthday of Gregor Mendel

27 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Thirty years of PET: our 'Fertility, Genomics and Embryo Research' report

27 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Children's rights and donor conception: What next?

20 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

The problems with lifting donor anonymity earlier

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856