PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentPreventing cross-border fertility treatment  raises legal as well as practical concerns

BioNews

Preventing cross-border fertility treatment  raises legal as well as practical concerns

Published 15 January 2010 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 345

Author

Diane Blood

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.

A recent report from the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) - the UK government's advisory body on genetics - 'Making Babies: Reproductive decisions and genetic technologies' is the latest in a string of reports designed to help the UK form new legislation on assisted reproduction. I was deeply concerned to read of this...

A recent report from the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) - the UK government's advisory body on genetics - 'Making Babies: Reproductive decisions and genetic technologies' is the latest in a string of reports designed to help the UK form new legislation on assisted reproduction. I was deeply concerned to read of this report's recommendation that the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) 'should explore ways in which clinics in the UK can be prevented from preparing or otherwise colluding with individuals intent on seeking treatments which are permissible abroad, but prohibited within the UK'.

In 1998 and 2001 I travelled to Belgium to undergo fertility treatment with my late husband's sperm- a treatment which, after the sperm had been taken, was found to be prohibited in the UK due to his lack of consent in writing. In order to have the treatment I desired in Belgium, I needed to export my late husband's sperm. The HFEA sought to prevent this. We relied on the European Communities (EC) Treaty right to unhindered access to medical treatment throughout the member states of the Union. The only counter to this right is if there is some overriding public policy argument against it, which withstands stringent tests of necessity and proportionality. This is what the HFEA tried to prove in my case, but failed. I won on Appeal. On their own legal advice, which stated that it was 'unlikely that the reasons previously given by the authority could in the exceptional circumstances of this case, satisfy the test of necessity and proportionality' the HFEA then allowed me to export the sperm.


It surprises me that nine years after my Appeal Court victory, a government's advisory body could consider preventing or hindering patients from travelling abroad for fertility treatment.


There is a wealth of existing legal authority on these issues. At court we cited a number of cases, but the ones that I feel are particularly relevant here are those concerning Irish women travelling abroad for abortion brought before both the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). In SPUC [Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child] v Grogan [1991], the ECJ ruled that a medical operation, performed in accordance with the law of the State in which it is carried out, constitutes a protected service within the meaning of Article 60 of the EC Treaty. It rejected the submission that 'the provision of an abortion cannot be regarded as being a service, on the grounds that [under Irish constitutional law] it is grossly immoral and involves the destruction of the life of a human being, namely the unborn child'.


Even more relevant, as the case particularly concerns the provision of information, is the reasoning of the ECHR in Open Door Counselling and Dublin Well Woman Clinic v Ireland [1994]. The Irish Government had tried to hinder its citizens from seeking abortions in England by preventing the distribution of information and literature on the subject. The ECHR found against them. We should not and cannot impose our laws on other countries, and within the EU the hindrance of cross-border medical treatment has already been proven to be against the law. I also think it is dangerous. It is unlikely to prevent anyone gaining the treatment they want, but may drive the treatment underground or lead to people undergoing treatment with poor advice, counselling or aftercare. These are services perhaps more relevantly provided in the UK, if the child is to be born and raised in a British society. We should also remember that the child itself did not choose the manner of their conception, and may benefit from links with a British clinic.


Many different kinds of patients travel abroad for all sorts of medical treatment that is unavailable in the UK for all sorts of reasons. No-one has ever suggested that these people be stopped. And how far should we go? For example, should British tour companies be prevented from promoting or selling trips to see bull fights when British people go on holiday to Spain? It is society and society's opinion which drives the kind of things that people want or seek, not statute, which I firmly believe should be flexible enough to move with the times. Doctors know their patients better than legislators who have never even met the people that their rules affect. In my opinion, where a patient could be treated abroad, doctors should be free to offer whatever advice or help they feel may benefit those concerned, according to their beliefs and conscience. To restrict medical practitioners in the manner proposed by the HGC impinges on their freedom of speech, and I am sure would prove impractical to implement in any event.

Related Articles

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
News
31 January 2012 • 1 minute read

Time to choose the future

by BioNews

On 16 July, the UK's Human Genetics Commission (HGC) began a nationwide consultation into the role of genetics in reproductive decision making. The aim of the consultation, entitled 'Choosing the Future', is to gauge the range of public opinion on issues raised by the use of genetic tests in reproduction...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
Comment
18 June 2009 • 3 minutes read

Widow receives judgment in case similar to mine

by Diane Blood

This past week there have been reports of a case similar to the court case I won against the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in 1997 (1,2,3). A woman was unexpectedly widowed when her husband underwent a routine minor operation in June 2007. Six days before that the couple...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Comment
18 June 2009 • 3 minutes read

Making Laws about making babies

by Dr Evan Harris

The recent report from the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) - the UK government's advisory body on genetics - 'Making Babies: Reproductive decisions and genetic technologies' is the latest in a series of reports on the state of the law on assisted reproduction in the UK. The House of Commons Science and Technology...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Comment
18 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

Made in the UK

by James Lawford Davies

The Human Genetics Commission (HGC)'s recent report 'Making Babies: Reproductive decisions and genetic technologies' is the welcome result of two years' consultation and debate. For the most part, the report offers clear and constructive conclusions and recommendations for the future of assisted reproduction and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), amongst...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
9 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

Widow claims human right to use dead husband's sperm

by MacKenna Roberts

The UK's High Court has ruled that it may have been unlawful for a widow to have removed her dead husband's sperm. Despite UK law requiring valid written consent for the storage and use of sperm, the 42-year-old widow obtained emergency Court permission to have sperm...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
News
9 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

Widow fights for right to use late husband's sperm to conceive

by Evelyn Harvey

A legal fight by a UK woman to have a child using sperm taken from her husband after his death is underway. The case highlights the need for regulatory clarity on the issue, which first came to prominence in 1995 when Diane Blood won the right to...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
News
9 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

Human Genetics Commission reports on reproductive and genetic technologies

by BioNews

The UK's Human Genetics Commission (HGC) has issued a report that says advances in the techniques that can be used by families at risk of passing on genetic diseases to their children are to be welcomed, but also need careful monitoring. The report, called 'Making Babies: reproductive decisions and genetic...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
News
9 June 2009 • 1 minute read

Posthumous fathers to gain legal recognition

by BioNews

Diane Blood has won her campaign to have her late husband's name on her children's birth certificates. Mrs Blood has been campaigning for legislation to be changed in the UK since her two children were born following the use of sperm taken from her husband after he died. Originally, the...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
News
9 June 2009 • 1 minute read

New Human Genetics Commission

by BioNews

The Department of Health has released details of appointments to the new Human Genetics Commission (HGC). The HGC replaces and extends the ambit of the Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing, the Advisory Group on Scientific Advances in Genetics and the Human Genetics Advisory Commission. The commission is to be chaired...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Keeping libel laws out of science - fighting for our right to debate

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

18 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

The birth of genetics: celebrating 200 years of Mendel

15 July 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: Prioritising Patient Safety – How to Minimise Risk in Fertility Treatment

11 July 2022 • 6 minutes read

Dutch Embryos Act under revision

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

18 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

The birth of genetics: celebrating 200 years of Mendel

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856