PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsReviewsTheatre Review: Frankenstein

BioNews

Theatre Review: Frankenstein

Published 20 August 2012 posted in Reviews and appears in BioNews 669

Author

John Brinsley

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.

With the term 'Frankenstein' having become synonymous with 'mad scientists' who 'play God', and its status as the go-to criticism against any new technology that threatens to interfere with what is deemed 'natural', Shelley's story is as relevant today as ever it was. Indeed, what was once considered so morally abhorrent that it formed the fabric of horror has, with recombinant DNA, IVF, organ donation and embryonic stem cells to name but a few, been realised today several times over...


Frankenstein

Adapted by Nick Dear from the novel by Mary Shelley

Organised by the National Theatre

Broadcast to cinemas by National Theatre Live

'Frankenstein', adapted by Nick Dear from the novel by Mary Shelley

With the term 'Frankenstein' having become synonymous with 'mad scientists' who 'play God', and its status as the go-to criticism against any new technology that threatens to interfere with what is deemed 'natural', Shelley's story is as relevant today as ever it was. Indeed, what was once considered so morally abhorrent that it formed the fabric of horror has, with recombinant DNA, IVF, organ donation and embryonic stem cells to name but a few, been realised today several times over.

The play is a faithful retelling of this infamous cautionary tale - the key departure being that it is told from the perspective of the Creature, rather than of his Promethean creator, and through this, plus some other pieces of clever restructuring, Shelley's original messages shine.

The Creature: 'You
make sport with my life.'

Frankenstein: 'In
the cause of science.'

Though tragically flawed by his ambition, Shelley's Frankenstein is, at heart, compassionate and kind. Dear remoulds him: exaggerating his scientific zeal to the absurd while all-but stripping him of any morality. Muting Frankenstein's humanity distils the essence of the scientist as cold and unfeeling, and disconnected from society. Though the Creature is hideously deformed, and culpable of the most heinous of crimes, we can always identify with him. We cannot with Frankenstein - his hubris makes him appear mutilated and grotesque, and we feel uncomfortable watching his inability to connect with the love of those around him. By building Frankenstein in this way Dear creates a monster, and amplifies Shelley's original caution: that scientific endeavour divorced from its human, social context, has the potential to become monstrous.

The Creature: 'Come Scientist: destroy me! Destroy your creation! Come!'

Benevolent throughout, the Creature has by the final scene become psychopathic and unrecognisable in his cruelty, and we can no longer relate to him - he has finally become a monster. But he explains that he has learnt the ways of men: 'how to ruin, how to hate, how to debase, how to humiliate... [and] how to lie'. And we can attest: we have watched how, seeking friendship and love, he has been rejected by all he meets and, desperate to learn how to become part of society, how the teachings of men have systematically disfigured him into the demon he has become.

The transformation is so marked as to be terrifying, and forces us to question how we approach those who do not conform to our social norms. But the message is deeper in today's context when, with the human genome mapped, the $1,000 genome around the corner and personalised medicine high on the political agenda we are, perhaps more than ever, guilty of blaming our genes for our behavioural and psychological, as well as our physical traits. Today's on-going 'nature versus nurture' debate is foreshadowed in the original, but takes centre stage in Dear's Frankenstein, cautioning us to reconsider the balance between genes and the environment when considering what makes us human.

The staging of Frankenstein is basic but effective - and at times, sensational. Three-thousand tungsten bulbs hang from the ceiling to give an industrial glow to the action beneath; blazing into brilliant white light when the Creature first opens his eyes. Similarly, the score is terrific at capturing both the cold, unyielding march of industry and the juggernaut of scientific endeavour, and the naive innocence of man corrupted by the desperation of love. (Incidentally, director Danny Boyle teamed up with previous collaborators Underworld to produce the soundtrack; a pairing revived for the opening ceremony of the London 2012 Olympics).

My only criticism would be that the dialogue which, at its best is sublime, has the tendency to become weak and lazy, and is let down further by mediocre secondary performances and some frankly odd casting. The lead actors more than compensate, however, and this is really only a small gripe with an otherwise outstanding production that is wonderfully successful at bringing Shelley's evocative and important story alive.

Sources and References

  • London: Faber and Faber Ltd
    1) Dear, N., (2011) Frankenstein, based on the novel by Mary Shelley

Related Articles

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Reviews
14 February 2011 • 4 minutes read

Event Review: Unnatural - The Heretical Idea of Making People

by Dr Rachael Panizzo

The creation of human life through artificial means is often portrayed as an inherently dangerous and unnatural process, where the product of any such attempt is assumed to be somehow inferior and lacking in humanity. This is a recurrent idea that looms over contemporary debate surrounding many scientific advances and technologies in biology, from reproductive cloning to embryonic stem cell (ESC) research, IVF and human genetics....

PET BioNews
Reviews
22 March 2010 • 3 minutes read

Book Review: Communicating Biological Sciences - Ethical and Metaphorical Dimensions

by Marianne Kennedy

My first impression of this book was that the title smacks of a dull read. On the contrary, however, this book provides a stimulating awakening into one of the challenges facing science writing today, namely the use of metaphor: its purpose in communication and consequences for science and public understanding...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
28 April 2008 • 4 minutes read

Scientists, hybrid embryos and the media

by Fiona Fox

Should scientists enter the media fray on the most controversial aspects of stem cell research when the row is clearly about much more than the science? This is a question that many in the scientific community have raised over the past year in relation to the furore over human-animal hybrid...

PET BioNews
News
8 November 1999 • 1 minute read

Halloween protest against 'Frankenscience'

by BioNews

This has not been a good year for life-scientists. Anti-GM activists dressed as genetically engineered monsters took part in Halloween celebrations in New York and Washington D.C. to protest against what they call 'Frankenscience'. The Campaign for Responsible Transplantation were out in force on the streets of New York's Greenwich...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Book Review: History of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, c1980-2000

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels


easyfundraising
amazon

This month in Reviews

  • Popular
  • Recent
13 November 2023 • 3 minutes read

TV Review: Stranger in My Family

6 November 2023 • 4 minutes read

Exhibition Review: Real Families – Stories of change

30 October 2023 • 3 minutes read

TV Review: DNA – Series two

16 October 2023 • 5 minutes read

Book Review: Patient 1 – Forgetting and finding myself

9 October 2023 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: The Gift – Fraud

27 November 2023 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: The Gift – Health

20 November 2023 • 5 minutes read

Event Review: The Science of Integrated Human Embryo Models

20 November 2023 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: The Gift – Mistakes

13 November 2023 • 3 minutes read

TV Review: Stranger in My Family

6 November 2023 • 4 minutes read

Exhibition Review: Real Families – Stories of change

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2023 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2023 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856