PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentTime to resolve the 'saviour siblings' issue

BioNews

Time to resolve the 'saviour siblings' issue

Published 18 June 2009 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 267

Author

Juliet Tizzard

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.

The British media has spent the weekend speculating on a decision expected to be made by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) this week on the vexed issue of 'saviour siblings'. The authority has to decide whether to relax its prohibition on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD...

The British media has spent the weekend speculating on a decision expected to be made by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) this week on the vexed issue of 'saviour siblings'. The authority has to decide whether to relax its prohibition on the use of PGD (preimplantation genetic diagnosis) and tissue typing in cases where the embryo is being selected for the tissue type alone.

One of the main concerns voiced in the saviour siblings debate is the potential impact of the procedure upon the children born. If they are created simply to be a tissue donor for a sick sibling, will they grow up feeling less valued than they ought to be? With only a handful of children around the world who have been born as a result of PGD and tissue typing, it's a little early to tell. But there must be a large number of children who have been born through natural conception whose parents hoped they might be a tissue match with an older sick sibling. Whilst we don't know much about these children either, we have no evidence that they have been harmed by knowing that potential tissue donation to their sibling was part of the reason that they were planned.


We already know of at least two children in this position. Zain Hashmi's younger brother, Harris, and Charlie Whitaker's younger sister, Emily, were both conceived naturally, but sadly turned out not be a tissue match for their sick siblings. Those who worry about the psychological welfare of the saviour sibling, particularly those who turn out not to be a match, should have their nerves calmed by the apparent wellbeing of these two children.


The existence of children like Harris Hashmi and Emily Whitaker demonstrates that PGD and tissue typing is not an instance of a new technology creating a problem that didn't already exist. Instead, with the availability of the 'saviour siblings' technique, an existing decision faced by some parents has been transplanted from the within the four walls of a couple's home to the boardroom of the HFEA. Maintaining the ban on 'saviour siblings' for non-inherited conditions won't make the issue go away: it will simply mean that British couples in this position are left with the rather slim chance of success offered by Mother Nature. Or, like the Whitaker family, they will go abroad for treatment.


What many parents seeking to use PGD and tissue typing to have another child want now is a speedy resolution to this issue. Politically motivated legal challenges and policy indecision have already led to terrible delays in patients getting the treatments they seek. With mothers running out of fertile years and sick children benefiting less from tissue transplants as they get older, time is something that these families simply do not have.

Related Articles

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
5 February 2013 • 6 minutes read

Film Review: My Sister's Keeper

by Nisha Satkunarajah

'My Sister's Keeper' is based on a book by the author Jodi Picoult. The youngest daughter of the Fitzgerald family, Anna (Abigail Breslin), decides to sue her parents for the ‘medical emancipation’ of her own body. Having been conceived through IVF and the resulting embryo tissue typed to ensure it was a match for her sick existing sibling, Anna was born for the primary reason of keeping her older sister, Kate (Sofia Vassilieva), a leukaemia patient, alive....

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« 'Fertility tourism': risk or choice?

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Recent
27 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Thirty years of PET: our 'Fertility, Genomics and Embryo Research' report

27 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Children's rights and donor conception: What next?

20 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

The problems with lifting donor anonymity earlier

20 June 2022 • 6 minutes read

An adaptive act: How should human fertilisation and embryology legislation respond to scientific and technological change?

13 June 2022 • 1 minute read

A new look for BioNews

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856