PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentWhy aren't we following WHO sperm guidelines?

BioNews

Why aren't we following WHO sperm guidelines?

Published 18 June 2009 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 323

Author

Dr Kate Whittington

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

Given the ongoing concerns about the apparent decline in male fertility over the last 50 years, one might be forgiven for thinking that the examination of human semen in the laboratory was now an exact science. This examination is a crucial part of the initial assessment of men reporting fertility...

Given the ongoing concerns about the apparent decline in male fertility over the last 50 years, one might be forgiven for thinking that the examination of human semen in the laboratory was now an exact science. This examination is a crucial part of the initial assessment of men reporting fertility problems. However, whilst we have made major progress in agreeing the methodology to be used in the andrology laboratory - largely through the publication of a laboratory manual by the World Health Organisation (WHO) - it seems we still have far to go.

Given that it is over six years since the publication of the 4th edition of the WHO manual (published in 1999), we decided to survey medical laboratories to see how they had implemented the techniques recommended to undertake just one aspect of semen analysis: sperm morphology assessment. This assessment of the size and shape of sperm is arguably one of the most difficult aspects of semen analysis to perform by laboratory scientists. But the literature suggests that, if it is done robustly, it is highly predictive of fertility: given that only sperm with a specific size and shape are thought to be able to enter cervical mucus following natural conception, or be able to bind to the human egg either in vivo or in IVF.


However, the results of our survey, to be published in the journal Human Reproduction, were somewhat surprising. They showed that of the 37 laboratories that responded, 70 per cent counted too few sperm to make a statistically reliable estimation of sperm morphology; 43 per cent tried to observe sperm that were not stained on a microscope slide; 22 per cent of laboratories used a stain that hadn't been recommended by WHO, and 16 per cent of laboratories used an inadequate magnification on the microscope. As such, when taking into account the additional recommendations for internal and external quality control measures, only 5 per cent of the responding laboratories were fully compliant with all the WHO recommendations for undertaking this aspect of semen analysis.

The laboratories that responded to the survey fell in almost equal numbers into those that could be defined as 'general laboratories' (i.e. those that did semen analysis as part of other diagnostic work) and 'specialist laboratories' (i.e. those linked to IVF units or sperm banks). A reasonable assumption might be that 'specialist laboratories' would fair better in terms of compliance than 'general' ones, given that they potentially have' better access to current literature as well as specific training programmes in assisted conception. However, the data shows that this is not the case, with an almost equal number of laboratories in each group failing to meet the WHO recommendations.


This survey is not merely an academic - or perhaps pedantic - exercise to examine the minutiae of an aspect of laboratory methodology: the results are perhaps more wide ranging and may be of great significance to patients. There has been ongoing debate about the importance of measures derived at semen analysis and whether they are at all predictive of outcome of spontaneous conception or assisted conception treatments such as IVF. Similarly, there is widespread concern about a possible decline of male fertility as seen in semen quality. However, the literature concerning both areas sometimes appears confusing with the results of many studies all too often apparently contradicting each other. But is that a surprise, if laboratories undertaking semen analysis ignore international guidelines so blatantly?

Related Articles

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
9 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

Most UK sperm banks fall below world standards

by BioNews

A new study has shown that only a small percentage of sperm banks in the UK comply with recommendations on sperm testing set by the World Health Organisation (WHO) six years ago. WHO laid down rigorous recommendations for sperm morphology assessment, the results of which can be used to predict...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
9 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

UK men need to think harder about their fertility

by BioNews

A study for Norwich Union Healthcare has shown that more than 2.5 million men in the UK could have fertility problems. The researchers asked doctors in general practice (GPs) about male infertility, finding that a nearly a third of them worried that declining male fertility will impact on an already...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Paternity testing: how to progress

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

8 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Citizenship and same-sex parents – about time, Sweden!

8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856