PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentHolding back the British IVF Revolution: A report into public IVF provision in the UK today

BioNews

Holding back the British IVF Revolution: A report into public IVF provision in the UK today

Published 12 November 2012 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 611

Author

Gareth Johnson

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

IVF is one of Britain's greatest inventions. Professor Robert Edwards received the Nobel Prize for Medicine for his pioneering work developing this fertility treatment and - in the last week - it has been announced that he will be knighted in the Queen's Birthday Honours list. The result of Professor Edward's work was Louise Brown, the world's first so-called 'test tube' baby. Britain, more than any other country, should be championing the use of IVF treatment...

IVF is one of Britain's greatest inventions. Professor Robert Edwards received the Nobel Prize for Medicine for his pioneering work developing this fertility treatment and - in the last week - it has been announced that he will be knighted in the Queen's Birthday Honours list. The result of Professor Edward's work was Louise Brown, the world's first so-called 'test tube' baby. Britain, more than any other country, should be championing the use of IVF treatment.

This is why, as Chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Infertility, I have produced a report to provide a snapshot of IVF provision in the UK today. This report seeks to compare the practises of PCTs - or their equivalent in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland - against the guideline for IVF provision laid down by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The information on which the report is based was collected through Freedom of Information (FoI) requests to Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) or their equivalent in March 2011. In total, 177 responded to the FoI requests and these data can be reviewed in the full report.

When I commenced work on this report, I had a hunch there would be a wide variation in IVF provision around the country - the so-called 'postcode lottery'. I do not claim to be a healthcare expert, but it seemed there was little consistency in IVF availability on the NHS. But I was not prepared for the numerous conditions and restrictions placed upon infertile couples, even in areas that offer IVF treatment. PCTs and their equivalents need to uphold the spirit of the NICE guideline, not only the letter, for IVF treatment on the NHS to be genuinely available to infertile couples.

The NICE guideline provides a good basis for deciding how IVF treatment should be offered to infertile couples. Many PCTS have used the guideline as the basis for their own policy and allow infertile couples up to three cycles of IVF treatment with certain restrictions. This is exactly how the guideline should be used. However, other PCTs have added their own stringent restrictions on who is eligible for treatment to the guideline. These restrictions have covered both partners' BMI (body mass index), whether they have children from previous relationships, and whether or not a partner smokes.

Perhaps the most disappointing finding of this report was the small number of PCTs providing three cycles of IVF, as recommended in the NICE guideline. Of the PCTs offering IVF to patients, 39 percent only offered one cycle of treatment. Twenty-six percent of PCTs offered two and a further 27 percent offered three cycles. Therefore, 73 percent of PCTs are offering less than the three cycles recommended by NICE. I believe PCTs should be striving to fulfil these important NICE recommendations to ensure the best possible IVF success rates.

There will always be limits on the amount of infertility treatment that can be given on the NHS. The NICE guideline achieves a fair balance between the needs of infertile couples and the limits that have to be placed on funding. It is therefore vital that PCTs adhere to it. It is also essential that IVF is recognised as a clinical need. All too often PCTs consider IVF to have the same priority as tattoo removal or other cosmetic procedures. However, as fertility problems affect one in seven couples in the UK - approximately 3.5 million people - I believe it is time that PCTs recognise the importance of treatments, such as IVF.

Thousands of couples who otherwise would have been unable to conceive are parents because of the IVF revolution. Thousands of children worldwide are alive today because of Professor Edward's work. That work should be celebrated and its provision across all parts of the NHS - in accordance with the NICE guideline - should be ensured. I look forward to reading the reviewed NICE guideline in 2012 and encourage all PCTs to strive towards meeting the criteria set out in it.

You can read the report in full on my website.

Related Articles

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
27 February 2013 • 2 minutes read

Time for fertility clinics to improve on compliance and procedures

by Annabel Christie

Following the investigation of abortion clinics, fertility clinics should now improve their procedures so that there are no unwanted surprises if they are similarly inspected...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
25 February 2013 • 4 minutes read

The new NICE guideline on fertility: an end to the postcode lottery or just another guideline?

by Mark Johnson

On 20 February 2013, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence published its new guideline on the assessment and treatment of couples with fertility problems...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
20 February 2013 • 1 minute read

Northern Ireland Assembly motion calls for end to IVF 'discrimination'

by Ayesha Ahmad

Couples in Northern Ireland claim they are being discriminated against as they are only offered one cycle of IVF treatment on the NHS. This is in comparison to the two or three available in the rest of the UK...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Reviews
15 January 2013 • 3 minutes read

TV Review: Postcode Lottery

by Cathy Holding

IVF is only miraculous and life-changing if it works, but in some areas of the country you're less likely to be able to try on the NHS. BBC One's 'Postcode Lottery' follows a couple who could attempt treatment if they lived elsewhere...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
9 January 2013 • 2 minutes read

A fifth of PCTs offer single women IVF on the NHS

by Rosemary Paxman

An investigation by the Daily Telegraph has found that a fifth of PCTs are offering single women IVF on the NHS...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Genetic medalling

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

15 August 2022 • 5 minutes read

Same-sex parent should not have been forced to adopt child

15 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: Editing the Human Genome – Where Are We Now? What Happens Next?

8 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Citizenship and same-sex parents – about time, Sweden!

8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856