PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentNuffield report: Parents should decide whether or not to 'tell'

BioNews

Nuffield report: Parents should decide whether or not to 'tell'

Published 22 April 2013 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 701

Author

Professor Wybo Dondorp

Ethicist at Maastricht University, the Netherlands
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.

The Nuffield Council report rightly rejects the call to pressurising parents into compliance, as this abstract ideal of openness disallows them to make their own moral judgements about what is best in their situation and for their family...

Last week, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics presented
its report on
ethical aspects of information sharing in donor conception.
Although the moral acceptability of third-party reproduction is still debated,
this report importantly starts from the position that there is nothing wrong
with services helping people to have children with donated gametes.

However, donor conception is much more than just
another reproductive option. Challenging issues related to compensation of
donors or payment for gametes were addressed in the Nuffield Council's earlier
report Human bodies:
donation for medicine and research
. In this new report the Council looks in
depth at another ethically relevant aspect of donor conception: the fact that
the use of gametes leads to genetic connections between the future child and
the donor. These may or may not be regarded as socially significant by the
several parties involved, and that may or may not lead to actual relationships
between them and might have medical significance as well.

Clearly, the provision and control of information both
about the use of donor gametes and the identity of the donor are crucial issues
in this respect. Legislation has put an end to anonymous donation in a number
of countries including the UK (2005), Sweden (1984), and the Netherlands (2004).
Elsewhere, for instance in Belgium, France, Spain and Denmark, anonymity has
remained the norm, suggesting different views across Europe about the
differential weight of the interests at stake.

However, in the UK and other countries that have chosen to abolish anonymity, there is a continuing debate
about whether additional regulation is needed to ensure that the legal right to
know the identity of the donor does not remain a token right for those who are
never told by their parents how they were conceived in the first place. In
order to address this concern, it has been proposed that the birth certificate should
indicate that the child was donor conceived. This measure aims to make it more
likely that parents will 'tell'.

The Nuffield Council report rightly rejects this call
for pressurising parents into compliance, as this abstract ideal of openness
disallows them to make their own moral judgements about what is best in their
situation and for their family. On the basis of the available evidence, and especially
in light of the possibly adverse impact of inadvertent and late disclosure, the
Working Party came to the conclusion that other things being equal, it is indeed
better to tell and to do so early in the life of the child. According to the
report, this is what parents-to-be should be told as part of pre-treatment
implications counselling.

However, other things may not always be equal. The
report refers to specific situations, such as parents who may have reason to
fear that in their community, openness about donor conception will not be in
the interest of their child or family. It may be well the case that such fears
are unfounded, and that is also why parents should be offered support in making
decisions about information sharing. As observed in the report, it turns out
that those who find it difficult to tell their children about how they were
conceived and yet decide to take this step usually do not regret their
decision. Still, it should remain their decision.

This does not mean, as was suggested by some critical
voices from the audience at the report launch, that the interests of the
parents are given priority over those of their donor-conceived children. Do
those critics really think that the interests of families and children are
better served if mandatory openness is imposed from outside? We normally expect
that parents will take on the responsibilities that come with the parental
role. The flip-side of this expectation is that they should then also be allowed
to make their own decisions. Without autonomy, there is no responsibility. Only
where parental abuse of power exposes children to clear harm should third
parties step in. On the basis of the evidence collected in the report, there is
no ground for maintaining that this would be the case where parents decide not
to tell their children that they were donor conceived.

Does the report invite parents to be dishonest? No it
does not: it invites them to consider the evidence that telling is usually
better and to take that into account when making a decision about their
situation. As said by sociologist Carol Smart at the report launch, we are
already witnessing a sea change towards greater openness. The report may
further contribute to this with its recommendations that emphasise support,
encouragement and empowerment.

The report's many recommendations not only address
professionals and regulators, but also suggest that the state, in its 'stewardship role', can be expected to promote the environment in which the
creation of families through donor conception is seen as unremarkable: as just
another way to create a family.

Wybo Dondorp, ethicist
at Maastricht University, NL, and member of the Nuffield Council Working Party
on donor conception

Related Articles

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Reviews
26 August 2014 • 6 minutes read

Book Review: Law, Policy and Reproductive Autonomy

by Dr Antony Starza-Allen

The legal framework for the regulation and provision of assisted reproductive technologies is situated within enormous social change, not least in the construction of the family, personal health management and expectations around access to emerging medical technologies....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Reviews
19 August 2013 • 3 minutes read

Radio Review: A donation for life

by Jess Ware

After a German court ruled that a 22-year-old woman conceived via sperm donation could know the identity of her biological father, radio station 1Live caught up with her and took a look into the world of assisted conception in Germany...

Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
Comment
20 May 2013 • 4 minutes read

Response to Ben Saer

by Olivia Montuschi

In addressing egg-donation dad-to-be Ben Saer's points in his BioNews article, it is hard to know where to start. Good parenting is of course supportive and protective, but it does not resolve the desire of some people to know more about who helped create them...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
13 May 2013 • 4 minutes read

Enough of Nuffield — let's stop sidelining donors

by Ben Saer

The recent Nuffield report makes two disappointing recommendations - that anonymous donation should not be reintroduced, and that the state should encourage those who donated pre-2005 to come forward. Both positions are obstructive to donors, past and present...

Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
Reviews
29 April 2013 • 3 minutes read

Report Review: Donor information sharing - Preservation of personal liberty or the indirect control over people's private lives?

by Dr Antony Starza-Allen

In its latest contribution to practical bioethics and policymaking, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics in its report on information sharing in donor conception recommends, among other things, that parents of donor-conceived children should not be mandated to inform them about their origins....

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
21 February 2013 • 3 minutes read

Nuffield Council on Bioethics Call for Evidence: Disclosure and Donor Conception

by Dr John Appleby and 1 others

The Nuffield Council on Bioethics has launched an inquiry on the ethics of disclosure in families with children conceived using donated reproductive tissue (i.e. eggs, sperm, or embryos). In spring 2013 the Council will publish a report on its findings, making policy recommendations where appropriate. This call for evidence is part of a long history of debate on the topic of disclosure in the UK and runs parallel to international debates in the USA, Canada, Australia and Europe...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
News
11 February 2013 • 2 minutes read

German court case may put an end to a sperm donor's anonymity

by Jess Ware

A regional appeals court in Hamm, Germany has ruled that a 22-year-old woman conceived via an anonymous sperm donor has a legal right to find out the identity of her biological father...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
News
1 February 2013 • 3 minutes read

UK 'known' sperm donors can apply to see offspring after landmark ruling

by Nina Chohan

The UK High Court has granted permission to two sperm donors in a same-sex relationship to apply for contact with their biological children, conceived through a known donation arrangement with two lesbian couples....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
18 January 2013 • 2 minutes read

Divorcee must support donor-conceived children born during marriage

by Cait McDonagh

A man has been ordered to pay child support to his ex-wife for two children conceived through a sperm donor and born during the marriage....

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Tributes to Professor Sir Robert Edwards

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

15 August 2022 • 5 minutes read

Same-sex parent should not have been forced to adopt child

15 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: Editing the Human Genome – Where Are We Now? What Happens Next?

8 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Citizenship and same-sex parents – about time, Sweden!

8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856