PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsNewsFertility specialists warn against unnecessary, expensive treatments

BioNews

Fertility specialists warn against unnecessary, expensive treatments

Published 23 May 2016 posted in News and appears in BioNews 852

Author

Dr Lone Hørlyck

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

A number of fertility specialists have raised concerns over private clinics offering expensive 'add-on' treatments to patients, sometimes without sufficient evidence of their effectiveness...

A number of fertility specialists have raised concerns over private clinics offering expensive 'add-on' treatments to patients, sometimes without sufficient evidence of their effectiveness.

In a series of interviews with The Independent, some of the leading experts in the field of assisted conception claim that clinics are handing out expensive, and 'potentially harmful' treatments 'like Smarties', and they criticise the industry for announcing 'breakthroughs' that were sometimes closer to marketing 'hype'.

The UK's fertility regulator, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) also told the newspaper that it has become 'increasingly concerned' about IVF 'add-ons'.

Speaking to The Independent, Professor Martin Johnson, emeritus professor of reproductive sciences at the University of Cambridge, said that some treatments used at fertility clinics suffered from 'a lack of scientific rigour'.

'What it means is the treatment could be making their situation worse and certainly not improving it – and is costing them money. It's all about anecdotal evidence or no objective evidence,' he said.  

One of the 'add-on' treatments that has been highlighted is an immune-suppressing treatment to prevent the embryo from being rejected by the mother, with several experts raising concerns about potential harmful consequences of this form of intervention.

Ashley Moffett, professor of immunology at the University of Cambridge, told The Independent: 'There's certainly no evidence that this does any good, and there is the potential that it can do harm because these treatments are immunosuppressive.'

Dr John Parsons, founder and former director of King's College Hopsital's Assisted Conception Unit and a trustee of the Progress Educational Trust, which publishes BioNews, said the increasing number of women waiting longer to have children and then seek help when they do not conceive has created a 'perfect storm' for fertility doctors at the moment.

'They often become desperate for help, even though the best thing to do is to keep trying to conceive naturally, and they'll pay money for treatments that they don't really have,' Dr Parsons told The Telegraph.

Dr Parsons said that some women are offered add-on treatments that have not been sufficiently tested by private providers when IVF fails to work. 'An awful lot of these clinics would not be financially viable without offering people these treatments,' he said.

Other add-on treatments have also been criticised, including preimplantation genetic screening, time-lapse photography and the use of intrauterine insemination, according to The Independent. Fertility treatment has seen only a slight rise in the IVF success rate of 26.5 percent in 2013 from 20 percent ten years previously (see BioNews 845), despite new treatments regularly being offered.

The HFEA told The Independent that it is working on providing information on additional treatments so that people are able to make informed decisions about whether or not to accept 'extras'.

Sally Cheshire, chair of the HFEA, said: 'Although the vast majority of clinics provide excellent care for fertility patients, we are becoming increasingly concerned about IVF treatment "add-ons" without a strong evidence base being offered at some clinics.'

However, the chairman of the British Fertility Society, Professor Adam Balen, said that clinics were already informing couples appropriately, providing information about the nature of the treatment and success rates.

He also argued that clinics were providing scientifically founded treatments only. 'All of these treatments have been tested around the world and have been studied in clinical trials – every single one. None have been shown to do harm,' he told the Mail Online.

Related Articles

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
23 October 2017 • 1 minute read

The fertility sector has a problem when it comes to IVF add-ons

by BioNews

The fourth in a series of videos filmed at the Progress Educational Trust's recent public debate 'Fertility Treatment Add-Ons: Do They Add Up?'...

PET BioNews
Comment
23 October 2017 • 1 minute read

Responsible innovation and IVF add-ons - it's time for the fertility sector to step up

by BioNews

The second in a series of videos filmed at the Progress Educational Trust's recent public debate 'Fertility Treatment Add-Ons: Do They Add Up?'...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
23 October 2017 • 1 minute read

The fertility sector should lead the debate on IVF add-ons

by BioNews

The first in a series of videos filmed at the Progress Educational Trust's recent public debate 'Fertility Treatment Add-Ons: Do They Add Up?'...

PET BioNews
Comment
2 May 2017 • 6 minutes read

IVF practices challenged: a response

by Professor Adam Balen

Professor Adam Balen argues that the recent Panorama investigation into the use of add-ons in fertility clinics is a misrepresentation of these clinics and a misunderstanding of the data...

PET BioNews
Reviews
16 January 2017 • 4 minutes read

Book Review: Avalanche — A Love Story

by Rebecca Carr

Avalanche is a courageous and intimate account of Australian novelist Julia Leigh's attempts to have a child through IVF...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
19 April 2016 • 6 minutes read

The good, the bad and the ugly: compassion and corruption in the commercial baby business

by Dr Ëlo Luik

Are business and medicine hopelessly intertwined in fertility care, at (quite literally) the expense of the patient?...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
2 November 2015 • 3 minutes read

'Worrying' trend in NHS IVF provision

by Rebecca Carr

The number of CCGs in England offering the recommended number of IVF cycles to its patients is falling, with two CCGs in Essex decommissioning their assisted conception services altogether...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
11 November 2013 • 3 minutes read

An inconvenient truth: ICSI is not necessary for the majority of IVF patients

by Dr Steven Fleming

Despite the views of several IVF experts that intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection is overused in IVF, it continues unabated. So why is nobody listening?...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
9 July 2013 • 2 minutes read

Low-tech, accessible IVF could cost just €200

by Siobhan Chan

A new technique using basic equipment to perform IVF could dramatically reduce costs and make the treatment 'universally accessible', say scientists reporting that 12 babies have been born so far from this approach...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Woman sues US sperm bank again for sperm mix-up

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
13 June 2022 • 2 minutes read

Drop in diversity of blood stem cells leads to old-age health issues

27 June 2022 • 2 minutes read

UK report reveals public attitudes to fertility, genomics and embryo research

27 June 2022 • 2 minutes read

Shortage of sperm donors despite men willing to donate

27 June 2022 • 2 minutes read

North East London CCG proposes offering three funded IVF cycles

27 June 2022 • 2 minutes read

Fibrosis drugs reverse ovarian ageing in mice

27 June 2022 • 2 minutes read

Gene implicated in motor neurone diseases discovered

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856