PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentWomb transplants — is surrogacy safer?

BioNews

Womb transplants — is surrogacy safer?

Published 13 November 2015 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 828

Author

Dr Natasha Hammond-Browning

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

The recent news that the Health Research Authority has given approval to a UK charity to conduct a clinical trial for womb transplants is seen as welcome news for women without wombs. But when compared to the extensive surgeries required for a womb transplant, is surrogacy not the safer option?...

The recent news that the Health Research Authority has given approval to a UK charity to conduct a clinical trial for womb transplants is seen as welcome news for women without wombs (1). Womb Transplant UK, led by Dr Richard Smith, a consultant gynaecologist at the Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital in London, has been given
approval to conduct a clinical trial involving ten womb transplants (2).

The donated womb will come from a brain-dead organ donor, and the health of the woman and the womb will be closely monitored for one year before an embryo will be implanted in the womb. The embryo will be created from the recipient's own egg and her partner's sperm and, if a pregnancy occurs, the fetus will be delivered at approximately eight months' gestation by caesarean section. When possible, couples will be given the option of trying for two pregnancies. The transplanted womb is to be removed six months after birth, negating the need to take immune suppressants for life (3,4).

Generally, transplants and advances in transplant procedures are to be welcomed as they can drastically improve the length and quality of life of patients. For example, kidney transplants allow people to live free of lengthy and life-consuming dialysis procedures. While organ transplants are usually carried out for life-lengthening reasons (i.e. without an organ donation, many people would die sooner
than, if they received one), womb transplants are not performed for life-lengthening purposes. However, I believe that the potential benefit of womb transplants needs to be more closely examined. The sole purpose and benefit of a womb transplant
is to provide the recipient with an opportunity to become pregnant and carry a child and, in this particular trial, any children produced will be genetically related to the woman who received the womb.

The pain and suffering of the involuntarily infertile
is not to be underestimated, and neither are the effects upon their lives and those around them. However, what makes this case study interesting is that the women who would be eligible for this clinical trial do have other options that will allow them to become parents, as they can choose to adopt a child, or utilise gestational surrogacy. Therefore, without a womb transplant, they are not denied the opportunity to be a parent but rather the opportunity to carry a child.

While adoption may not be the preferred option of the involuntarily infertile, particularly when the woman without the womb has functioning ovaries, gestational surrogacy would produce the same result as a womb transplant in this clinical trial — a genetically related child.

Of particular concern is that the potential recipients of a womb transplant will be putting themselves and their bodies through substantial risk and stress in order to achieve something that can be achieved via a far less risky route. The recipients will undergo major surgery at least twice, to receive the womb transplant and to remove it, as well as up to two planned caesarean sections, in addition to taking anti-rejection drugs (and the associated risks) throughout the period that they have the transplanted womb.

However, in both the gestational surrogacy and the womb-transplant option, the recipient will need to take drugs to stimulate her ovaries for the production of eggs for the creation of embryos for the IVF procedure. This is a process that cannot be avoided in either scenario.

I do not deny that there are problems with surrogacy* — not least asking another woman to run the risks of pregnancy on your behalf — but when compared to the extensive surgeries required for a womb transplant, is it not the safer option? Where the gestational surrogate has freely and voluntarily consented to carry a pregnancy on behalf of another woman, surrogacy must be preferable to the multiple risky procedures to transplant a womb in order to (potentially) carry a high-risk pregnancy. Recipients of donated wombs are at risk of far greater harm by choosing to undergo a womb transplant due to the extensive, and currently experimental, surgery required.

On one hand, pregnancy is a uniquely feminine experience, and one that I can understand that women without wombs may want to experience for themselves, but is it an experience that they will deem life-changing enough to put themselves through surgery? On the other hand, if the goal of the women eligible for this transplant is to have a genetically related child, why not achieve that goal through surrogacy? And if the UK law on surrogacy is reformed to recognise genetic/intended parents as legal parents from birth, this would be another incentive to avoid needless surgery.

There is far more to consider than just the potential future children and the scientific advances that are being made — the health and well-being of the women involved must also be taken into account.

 


*The problems with surrogacy are well documented and include concerns around the exploitation of women, the commodification of children, consent, financial inducements, unenforceability of contracts (in the UK context at least) and the legal status of intended parents. Examples of literature include S Wilkinson 'Bodies for Sale: Ethics and exploitation in the human body trade' (Abingdon, Routledge 2003), K Horsey 'Swept Under the Carpet: Why Surrogacy Law Needs Urgent Review' in N Priaulx and A Wrigley (Eds) 'Ethics, Law and Society Volume V' (Ashgate, Surrey, 2013), R Ber Ethical Issues in Gestational Surrogacy (2000) 21 Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 153-169.

 

Related Articles

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
25 March 2019 • 7 minutes read

Revolutionising reproduction: the future of fertility treatment

by Ana Hallgarten

The Progress Educational Trust (PET) symposium event 'Revolutionising Reproduction: The Future of Fertility Treatment' took place at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh on the 19th March 2019...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
21 November 2016 • 3 minutes read

Altruistic anonymous uterus donation — altruism at the highest level?

by Dr Natasha Hammond-Browning

Sixteen uterus donations have occurred worldwide, and so far only a research team in Sweden has carried out transplants that successfully produced live births. The Swedish trial involved donations from living persons...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Reviews
25 October 2016 • 5 minutes read

Event Review: The ethics of uterus transplantation

by Dr Nicola Williams

This symposium was organised to facilitate in-depth discussion as well as international and interdisciplinary collaboration between academics and clinicians with an interest in uterus transplantation (UTx), which would allow women who lack a functioning uterus to become pregnant and give birth to their own babies...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
18 April 2016 • 4 minutes read

Womb transplants — are they worth the risk?

by Dr Natasha Hammond-Browning

The first US uterus transplant was carried out in February, but before we continue down this route we need to ask whether the risks outweigh the benefits of these procedures...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
News
12 October 2015 • 3 minutes read

Womb transplants approved for ten UK women

by Nina Chohan

Ethical approval has been given for clinical trials involving ten womb transplants in the UK to go ahead....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
21 September 2015 • 4 minutes read

Uterus transplantation trials: is deceased donation morally preferable?

by Dr Nicola Williams

There are currently good arguments for allowing living donors to be used in uterus transplants, but as research continues there may come a time when only deceased donors will be justifiable...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
13 October 2014 • 3 minutes read

Womb transplants: 'Now the impossible has become real'

by Dr Amel Alghrani

Following the first baby born after a womb transplant, the time has come to debate uterus transplantation. How will it be regulated in the UK and what social, legal and ethical issues does it raise?

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
10 October 2014 • 3 minutes read

First baby born following womb transplant

by Dr Barbara Kramarz

A boy has become the first baby to be born to a womb transplant recipient....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
10 March 2014 • 3 minutes read

Ethics around womb transplantation

by Dr Kevin Grimes

Ethics is about communication, and this is true when looking back on our ethical discussion of womb transplantation...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
7 March 2014 • 2 minutes read

Embryo transfer for four women after womb transplants

by Dr Barbara Kramarz

Four women who had womb transplants have had embryos transferred in an attempt to become pregnant...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Debating donor conception 10 years after the removal of anonymity

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

15 August 2022 • 5 minutes read

Same-sex parent should not have been forced to adopt child

15 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: Editing the Human Genome – Where Are We Now? What Happens Next?

8 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Citizenship and same-sex parents – about time, Sweden!

8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856