PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentNew Life for the HFEA

BioNews

New Life for the HFEA

Published 28 January 2013 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 690

Author

Baroness Ruth Deech

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

In January the Department of Health published its response to the consultation on proposals to transfer the functions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and the Human Tissue Authority to the Care Quality Commission and the new Health Research Authority...

In January the Department of Health (DH) published its response to the consultation on proposals to transfer the functions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) and the Human Tissue Authority (HTA) to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the new Health Research Authority (1). There were 479 pages of replies; 75 percent of the respondents did not favour the proposals.

It is heartening to report that the DH listened carefully and has reprieved the HFEA, although it is going to consider afresh the issue of merging the HFEA and the HTA. It is hoped that the two years of uncertainty that have overshadowed the work of the HFEA will now come to an end. It arose from the Government's understandable anxiety to prune the number of quangos in existence.

The arguments against dismembering the HFEA were always strong and convincing. Those who initially favoured the transfer of functions seemed to believe that the Government's plans would actually mean no or less regulation. The primary legislation was however always going to stay in place, but the regulation would be carried out by other bodies with less expertise. It was particularly encouraging to note the number of responses favouring retention of the HFEA and the HTA that were submitted by individuals who had experience of dealing with these organisations and had appreciated the experience. The needs of patients had perhaps not been sufficiently considered.

The arguments that carried weight in the end were the risk of losing the expertise that had been built up over the years by the HFEA and the HTA, together with the trust and respect gained nationally and internationally for the way assisted reproduction and human tissue matters are dealt with in the UK. The need to keep a discrete focus on them, and provide one centre for information, data collection and research proposals triumphed.

The relatively very small savings that might be made by the proposed transfer also played a part; indeed more has probably been spent on consulting and debating reconfiguration over the last few years than might have been saved by doing it. No doubt the morale of the staff has been affected, and it seems that 'back office' savings have already been made by the two organisations in anticipation of change.

The drawbacks of the CQC meant that it was not favoured as a replacement for HFEA inspection. It is just possible that had a more admired organisation been suggested as a repository for HFEA functions, the changes might have won more support. But the consultation coincided with a period when it seemed that every week there was a report of a fresh failure in health services that was attributed in part to the CQC's failure to monitor them. This impression undermined the confidence that the sensitive subject matter of the HFEA and the HTA could be safely transferred. And sensitive it is — the idea that IVF is now routine was not accepted.

IVF might be routine to the practitioners who handle it every day, however, as the public and parliamentary debates of recent years have shown, IVF and embryos are anything but uncontroversial to those not working in the sphere. A few years ago there was a massive public reaction to the holding of tissue, which is now successfully under control.

The range of responses, from individuals, medical organisations and associated organisations, even those opposed to IVF in principle, shows that where there is an important issue and those with an interest to work to explain and defend it, this can persuade and succeed. There was a well organised and heartfelt campaign to keep the two bodies.

There is good regulation, and there is bad regulation. Reproductive technology regulation is in the former category because without it there would be a risk to the public from the activity. In this field, there is asymmetry of information, considerable costs borne by the patients, and without special attention and regulation their welfare, their rights and their future children's health are at stake. It is a tribute to the DH that they recognised this.

It is a pity that in light of the very reasonable opinions expressed in the responses to the consultation, that there should still be a review of the efficiency of the HFEA and the HTA, leading the DH to consider again the possibility of merging the two. This was considered in great detail by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and Embryos Bill in 2007 (2) and rejected, for similar reasons. We have a British and international success story here and it should be kept that way.

Related Articles

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
20 October 2014 • 4 minutes read

Better Together: Why devolution of fertility legislation is not a good thing

by Stephen Harbottle

The Association of Clinical Embryologists is concerned that proposals to devolve powers for forming legislation covering the provision of fertility treatment, genetic screening and abortion to the Scottish Parliament may be a step too far in the process of devolution...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
19 July 2013 • 2 minutes read

HFEA will remain independent, says UK Government

by Cait McDonagh

The Department of Health has announced that the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority will remain the independent regulator of assisted reproduction and embryology research in the UK...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
31 May 2013 • 5 minutes read

IVF: the real moral debate

by Professor Alison Murdoch

The culture of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority is now one based on self-aggrandisement and self-preservation. But cultural problems with fertility treatment in England and Wales do not stop there and other stakeholders must also be called to account...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
10 April 2013 • 3 minutes read

Greater than the sum of its parts - comment from the HFEA

by Peter Thompson

It's a busy week for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). As we launch our government-commissioned public consultation on mitochondria replacement, we are in the midst of a public debate about who should regulate IVF and embryo research. We will publish our response to the Government's consultation on the HFEA's future later this week. This comment piece gives a taste of what we will be saying....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
19 March 2013 • 3 minutes read

Who will look after donor conception if the HFEA goes?

by Walter Merricks

To many people concerned with donor conception - patients, parents, donors and donor-conceived people - the Government plans to abolish the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) sound extremely worrying...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
24 September 2012 • 5 minutes read

Quangoing, going, gone: what should happen to the HFEA?

by Cait McDonagh

'Quangoing, going, gone', a debate organised by the Progress Educational Trust and the Anne McLaren Memorial Fund highlighted the diverse viewpoints on just what should happen to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority as the government seeks to streamline health regulation...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
16 July 2012 • 4 minutes read

Concerns about the consultation on the future of the HFEA

by Rachel Cutting

At the Association of Clinical Embryologists - the professional body representing clinical embryologists in the UK and abroad — we have grave concerns about dissolving the HFEA...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
9 July 2012 • 3 minutes read

Better regulation for fertility treatment: a review of the options

by Professor Alison Murdoch

Government intends to save money by improving the efficiency of regulatory bodies. Providers of fertility treatments also favour more efficient regulation as it would help them improve their own services. This common purpose - the need for improved efficiency - is reflected in the consultation announced by the government; the central question is how it should be achieved...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Receiving: The Recipient Parent Perspective

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

18 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

The birth of genetics: celebrating 200 years of Mendel

15 July 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: Prioritising Patient Safety – How to Minimise Risk in Fertility Treatment

11 July 2022 • 6 minutes read

Dutch Embryos Act under revision

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

18 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

The birth of genetics: celebrating 200 years of Mendel

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856