PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsReviewsPodcast Review: The Dangers of DIY Genetic Testing (Science Weekly, The Guardian)

BioNews

Podcast Review: The Dangers of DIY Genetic Testing (Science Weekly, The Guardian)

Published 28 October 2019 posted in Reviews and appears in BioNews 1021

Author

Dr Laura Riggall

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.

By 2022 the world's consumer genetic testing market is expected to quadruple to £200 million, according to The Guardian. But while the popularity of DIY genetic testing has undergone huge expansion in recent years, doctors and scientists have called for a crackdown on tests offered by consumer genetics companies such as 23andMe and AncestryDNA...

By 2022 the world's consumer genetic testing market is expected to quadruple to £200 million, according to The Guardian. But while the popularity of DIY genetic testing has undergone huge expansion in recent years, doctors and scientists have called for a crackdown on tests offered by consumer genetics companies such as 23andMe and AncestryDNA.

Why is this the case? Surely, such means of testing opens up new possibilities to determine future health risks to individuals, and empower them to take action?

To find out more, I listened to an October edition of The Guardian's Science Weekly podcast, where journalist Hannah Devlin and selected experts discussed what dangers do-it-yourself (DIY) genetic tests pose, and why many professionals are unsettled by them.

The episode starts with a baffling statistic, that 'according to a recent piece in the MIT Technology Review, by the start of this year more than 26 million have taken a direct-to-consumer test'. I was intrigued by why individuals would want to know more about their genome, and what they do with their results.

Anneke Lucassen, professor of clinical genetics at the University of Southampton, and an honorary consultant at Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, provides some insight. She reflects on the experience of one of her patients, who delved into her genetics via an ancestry test that had been given to her as a gift.

'She was very interested to know where her father might have come from. And then she decided to send that kit off to other companies to see what else might be in her raw genetic data that they provided as a zip file. And that, to her surprise, came back with an alteration in the BRCA1 gene,' said Professor Lucassen.

Mutations in BRCA genes convey a high risk of breast and ovarian cancers. Professor Lucassen continued: 'She was very concerned about that…and was interested in having her breasts and ovaries removed as a preventative measure.'

The operation was only cancelled when the NHS, which uses more powerful genotyping tools, showed the result was a false positive. Despite the revelation, Professor Lucassen said the patient asked: 'Can I have the surgery anyway, just to be on the safe side?'

How one wrong result had such great impact shocked me, and I thought back to the 26 million who have taken one of these tests; I doubted whether it was an isolated case. Indeed, Professor Lucassen revealed she is aware of around 10 cases where patients were referred to genetics services after having tested positive for BRCA or bowel cancer mutations, which were later shown to be false by the NHS.

Why professionals are speaking out about DIY genetic testing is becoming very clear. But why are such catastrophic mistakes being made? Part of the problem is that the technology used by direct-to-consumer companies, which looks at SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms), is not designed to give accurate results for rare mutations.

'SNPs are single points of variation throughout the genetic code…they are good at identifying common variation within a population, but bad at accurately identifying a rare variation,' Professor Lucassen said. Consequently, a test may give a false positive.

A recent analysis emphasised just how inaccurate these tests can be. The study, conducted at the University of Exeter, found that a commercial DNA test used by direct-to-consumer companies was correct just 16 percent of the time when it detected a rare pathogenic BRCA mutation. It also failed to identify more than half of individuals with actual BRCA mutations in a UK BioBank dataset of 49,908 individuals.

Even if raw data is correct, secondary companies may provide further information at the request of an individual. This, however, may lead to misinterpretation.

It was also disturbing to hear the psychological impact inflicted on individuals, who aren't necessarily reassured because they believe results have been provided through a highly technical and accurate route. 

Genetic counsellors are also left to deal with alarming or confusing results. One patient, according to Dr Amy Taylor, lead consultant genetic counsellor at Addenbrooke's hospital in Cambridge, sought re-analysis after their test results that had originally shown five or six pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. 'If true, the patient probably wouldn't be alive, but the patient didn't know that, and neither did their GP who referred them to us,' Dr Taylor said.

Even if test results are correct, 'it can be difficult to interpret them depending on family history', she said.

Therefore, care must be taken when seeking interpretation, but this is emphasised by 23andMe, which, speaking to Devlin, said: 'We do not advice customers to utilise third party interpretation services, and note the risks of doing so very clearly on our website and within customers' accounts.'

The podcast ends with a few words of advice from the panel, with Professor Lucassen summarising her thoughts in both a humorous and hard-hitting manner: 'If you are interested in using a test, then use it to determine the pedigree of your dog. But even then, take any results with a pinch of salt,' she said.

Overall, this podcast was both intriguing and informative, providing raw perspectives from a number of professionals while keeping scientific jargon to a minimum. Although there is little doubt such tests have the potential to be life-changing, there are still caveats. If, like myself, you are keen to know more, then I would highly recommend setting aside a mere half-hour of your day to indulge in this offering from The Guardian.

Related Articles

Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
News
11 July 2022 • 2 minutes read

Commercial DNA testing used to gain donor conception information

by Alex Kastelein

With consumer DNA testing growing in popularity, it is becoming increasingly difficult to ensure the anonymity of both donors and donor-conceived children...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
25 June 2021 • 2 minutes read

Policymakers advised to address problems with direct-to-consumer genomic testing

by Michaela Chen

The UK Government should review regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic tests, according to a report by the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
2 November 2020 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: DNA and Me

by Dr Yvonne Collins

This BBC podcast focuses on direct-to-consumer DNA tests and identity...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
27 March 2020 • 5 minutes read

Radio Review: Crowdscience - Can I trust DNA ancestry tests?

by Isobel Steer

'I just took a DNA test', sings Lizzo on her 2017 hit single 'Truth Hurts'...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
21 February 2020 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Genetics Unzipped — Hidden family secrets revealed by genetic testing

by Christina Burke

'What is it to be human? What is it to be family?' These are the words of this week's interviewee, Jack Nunn, on The Genetics Society 'Unzipped' podcast: 'Hidden family secrets unveiled by genetic testing'...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
News
18 October 2019 • 3 minutes read

Health reports from direct-to-consumer genetic tests 'woefully incomplete'

by Jen Willows

Direct-to-consumer genetic tests should not be used as a basis for medical decision making, according to two separate studies released last week...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
1 August 2019 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: 23andMe (and You, and Everyone Else) — Freakonomics

by Francesca Sowerbutts

23andMe advertises itself on its website as a way to 'meet your genes'. You can send off a spit sample, and for $99-$199, a report based on your genetics will be emailed to you a few weeks later...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Comment
1 July 2019 • 4 minutes read

What can healthy individuals learn from getting their genomes sequenced?

by Dr Jess Buxton

The past few years have seen a huge increase in the identification of rare and common genetic variants associated with disease, advances made possible through ever cheaper and faster genome sequencing technologies...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
24 June 2019 • 5 minutes read

Donor conception and direct-to-consumer DNA testing

by Dr Yvonne Collins

The Progress Educational Trust (PET), which publishes BioNews, held a public event in London to discuss direct-to-consumer genetic testing in relation to donor anonymity...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« TV Review: Eugenics: Science's Greatest Scandal

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
20 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Documentary Review: Our Father

20 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: How Far Could Genome Editing Go?

13 June 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Happy Mum Happy Baby – Tom Daley

13 June 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: The Outlook – The shocking truth about my three dads

23 May 2022 • 4 minutes read

Documentary Review: Freezing Fertility

1 August 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Stories of Our Times – IVF, fraud and 'unwanted' children

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: DNA Family Secrets – series two, episode six

18 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: Spotlight – The babymaker uncovered

11 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: DNA Family Secrets – series two, episode three

4 July 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Biohacked Family Secrets – The birth of the sperm bank

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856