PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentSurrogacy law: a call for change?

BioNews

Surrogacy law: a call for change?

Published 5 August 2013 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 716

Authors

Susan Imrie

Dr Vasanti Jadva

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority intends to update its guidance on surrogacy for clinics, and while we welcome this clarification, it is also important to consider how surrogates feel the law shapes their experiences...

Surrogacy arrangements in the UK can be a successful
route to parenthood
and a rewarding experience for those involved. Surrogacy
law, however, is complex, and concerns have been raised about the varying quality of advice provided to individuals considering surrogacy.
In light of this, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA)
intends to update its guidance on surrogacy for clinics, and while we welcome
this clarification, it is also important to consider how surrogates feel the
law shapes their experiences. Do current laws help or hinder surrogacy
arrangements? How do surrogates navigate the potential pitfalls and where do
they turn to for information? Could changes, legal or otherwise, be introduced
to smooth the process for surrogates and intended parents (IPs)? Furthermore,
it is crucial that the views of traditional (or 'genetic/straight') surrogates are
not overlooked, as their route to surrogacy bypasses clinic involvement.

Over the past two years we have been carrying out in-depth
interviews with surrogates and their families about their long-term experiences
of surrogacy. Around half of the surrogates had carried out surrogacies some
years ago and half were still actively involved in surrogacy. As part of this
process we asked participants how they viewed surrogacy law, whether they had
concerns about how surrogacy is carried out, and whether they could recommend
improvements.

Surrogates taking part in our study frequently singled out the
lack of parental leave allowance for IPs as being unjust. Since data collection
ended, proposals have been included in the Children
and Families Bill
to bring parental leave for IPs in line with legislation
on leave for adoptive parents, and this has been broadly welcomed by those
involved in surrogacy.

A further area highlighted by some surrogates was the complex
question of who is named on the child's birth certificate, with several married
surrogates expressing discontent with having to register their husband as the
child's legal father. In one case, a surrogate reported that her husband, from whom
she had been separated for some time, had to be named on the birth certificate,
a situation she called 'bizarre'. This view was echoed by some surrogates'
partners who raised the concern independently in their interviews.

Similar concerns were raised by other surrogates who
mentioned that in the period before a Parental Order is granted, the surrogate
is legally responsible for decisions concerning the baby, a responsibility many
stated should lie with the IPs. This question becomes particularly pertinent if
the baby needs emergency medical care. On the rare occasions where this
situation had arisen, surrogates felt it had been handled well by hospitals, but
it is possible that greater clarity would be beneficial to support surrogates
and IPs at this already stressful time. Some surrogates argued for a mechanism
to be introduced whereby parental responsibility could be transferred to the IPs
at birth. Whilst we recognise the difficulties inherent in balancing the
interests and care of all the parties involved throughout the surrogacy
arrangement, we feel that the questions pertaining to legal responsibility for
the child in the months following birth would benefit from further
consideration and discussion.

There was a call from many surrogates for information on
surrogacy to be more widely available, and for healthcare professionals and
administrative staff to be better informed. While some surrogates reported that
hospital staff had been well-informed and supportive, facilitating a smooth surrogacy
arrangement, others mentioned cases where hospitals had been less
accommodating, for example by making it difficult for both IPs to be in the room
during prenatal scans. In another case, registry office officials gave a
surrogate incorrect information about registering the child's birth. Had she
not checked the information with her surrogacy organisation, she may have
risked jeopardising the Parental Order.

Many surrogates identified surrogacy organisations as a valid
source of support and, in most cases, their primary source of information. Some
surrogates raised concerns about surrogacies arranged without surrogacy
organisations' involvement and the lack of support available to those who chose
this option. Conversely, several surrogates who had carried out independent
arrangements mentioned the laws against advertising and the difficulties
finding couples.

Much recent debate has focused on legislation around expenses.
Most surrogates we spoke to were happy with the current system of receiving
reasonable expenses, and perhaps this view is unsurprising given that most surrogates
had experienced positive surrogacy arrangements within the current framework. There
was also a strong belief that introducing commercial surrogacy would result in
women acting as surrogates for the 'wrong reason' - ie, having financial rather
than altruistic motives. Many thought the current system works well as it
prevents women from receiving vast sums of money, whilst also giving some
flexibility in the amount received, thus recognising the individual nature of
each pregnancy.

The study's findings echo calls
for a review of surrogacy laws
and highlight areas where greater discussion
and clarification would be beneficial for all concerned. We urge that any
review should include consultation with those directly affected by surrogacy,
specifically surrogates and their families, IPs and surrogacy children, who
have direct experience and knowledge of this complex and evolving field.

Related Articles

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Comment
15 June 2015 • 5 minutes read

Seeking views on surrogacy in the UK

by Dr Kirsty Horsey

A working group from Surrogacy UK has devised an online survey seeking views on people's experiences of surrogacy in the UK and opinions on the way it is regulated...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
News
6 October 2014 • 2 minutes read

Surrogacy: High Court grants parental order after deadline

by Dr Antony Starza-Allen

The UK's High Court has granted a parental order following surrogacy despite a six month deadline for making them having passed, describing strict enforcement of the deadline as 'almost nonsensical'...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Comment
6 May 2014 • 4 minutes read

Surrogacy: Perspectives from a commercial model

by Andrew Powell

I've always been interested in the law related to surrogacy. Through the Pegasus Scholarship Scheme founded by the Inner Temple, I obtained a placement at a law firm in Los Angeles that specialised in surrogacy and fertility law. I was keen to see how commercial surrogacy operates within a regulated paradigm...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Reviews
16 December 2013 • 4 minutes read

Event Review: Surrogacy for Same-Sex Couples

by Daniel Malynn

This event, hosted by the Bar Council, looked the options and potential pitfalls same-sex couples can face can face in accessing surrogacy both in the UK and overseas...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Comment
30 September 2013 • 3 minutes read

Surrogacy: What is so brilliant about 'Brilliant Beginnings'?

by Dr Amel Alghrani and 1 others

Surrogacy law is a mess and no longer fit for practice. As increasing numbers resort to the use of international surrogates or the 'murky waters' of the World Wide Web to find a surrogate, the law is relegated to cleaning up the aftermath...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
News
26 July 2013 • 3 minutes read

Indian surrogate mothers underpaid, unprotected in an unregulated industry

by Ari Haque

Indian surrogate mothers are frequently underpaid and insufficiently cared for, a report from an Indian charity claims. The Centre for Social Research in New Delhi says there is little protection for surrogates in a growing industry without an adequate legal framework...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
News
24 June 2013 • 2 minutes read

Adjustment problems for surrogate-born children are minimal

by Dr Linda Wijlaars

Children born with the help of sperm or egg donation or via surrogacy are well-adjusted at the age of ten, a study says...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
News
3 June 2013 • 2 minutes read

International surrogacy arrangements need parental orders, says UK judge

by Dr Antony Starza-Allen

A UK High Court judge has said applications for parental orders in international surrogacy cases should be encouraged and made promptly...

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Comment
11 March 2013 • 4 minutes read

The mother isn't always certain: Irish surrogacy case leads the way

by Dr Kirsty Horsey

Once upon a time, motherhood was certain. It was proved by giving birth. The Latin maxim 'mater semper certa est' that told us so was irrefutable. Whether or not that was ever actually true, it has for a long while been biologically, as well as socially, questionable....

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Embryo testing: Why drawing lines risks devaluing the disabled

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

15 August 2022 • 5 minutes read

Same-sex parent should not have been forced to adopt child

15 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: Editing the Human Genome – Where Are We Now? What Happens Next?

8 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Citizenship and same-sex parents – about time, Sweden!

8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856