PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsReviewsTV Review: Bang Goes the Theory

BioNews

TV Review: Bang Goes the Theory

Published 25 October 2012 posted in Reviews and appears in BioNews 603

Author

Nkechi Nwachukwu

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

'Bang goes the theory' is a TV show that aims to bring science to the masses by 'putting science and technology to the test'. It tries to achieve this with the aid of four fairly young enthusiastic presenters and a fast-paced style. But did the show achieve its aim with IVF?...


Bang Goes the Theory

BBC1, Monday 21 March 2011

Presented by Liz Bonnin

'Bang Goes the Theory', BBC1, Monday 21 March 2011 (presented by Liz Bonnin)


'Bang Goes the Theory' is a TV show that aims to bring science to the masses by 'putting science and technology to the test'. It tries to achieve this with the aid of four fairly young enthusiastic presenters and a fast-paced style. But did the show achieve its aim with IVF?

Episode two of the show's fourth series covered three items, including an informative piece on IVF. The IVF item began with a brief background on the procedure and used two couples to illustrate two specific techniques. One of the presenters summarised aspects of the process, including how hormones are used to increase a woman's number of egg follicles and subsequent egg production. They also discussed how sperm quality affects the technique used. A concentrated solution of good-quality sperm can be incubated together with an egg to allow sperm competition and therefore 'natural' fertilisation to occur. Sperm with poor mobility (and therefore unsuitable for this method) may be injected directly into the egg's cytoplasm by the process of ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection).

The first couple produced a good number of eggs and had good sperm quality - some may wonder why they were having problems conceiving. This was never really discussed. They used the first method, but failed to conceive. However, the second couple used ICSI and did conceive. There was no explanation provided to identify why ICSI (a seemingly more fail-proof method) was not used in the first instance, nor were any of the possible risks mentioned. During ICSI, any sperm may be selected to fertilise the egg instead of the strongest one (as in a natural setting where the sperm compete and the strongest fertilises the egg). For this reason, ICSI may lead to a small, but increased, risk of congenital abnormalities when compared to the more traditional method (as described above). This has been highlighted by the Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, but was not mentioned in the programme.

The presenter then discussed how IVF success (pregnancy) rates have not increased in the 30 years since it was first used. It was claimed one of the reasons for this was the time taken to implant an embryo into a woman's womb. This can be five to seven days after fertilisation to allow embryologists to determine which embryos are likely to successfully implant. The presenters discussed some recent research from Stanford University in the USA. These researchers had discovered that monitoring the pace of cell division in the first days of embryonic development allowed them to predict which embryos would become most suitable for implantation. Such embryos could then be implanted much more quickly. The topic was certainly worth highlighting but some comments on the lack of research in this area would have provided a more balanced report.

This episode certainly did achieve its aim to bring science to the masses. However, although it was vaguely entertaining, it was not particularly informative or balanced.

Related Articles

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
22 September 2015 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: Countdown to Life, The Extraordinary Making of You - The First Eight Weeks

by Dr Sandy Raeburn

About forty years ago meetings of the London Dysmorphology Club were held at Great Ormond Street Hospital. This club set out to document the clinical features of childhood congenital disorders and to give as precise a label as possible to the underlying conditions, most of which were extremely rare....

PET BioNews
Reviews
9 December 2013 • 2 minutes read

Film Review: Dance Your PhD

by Dr Linda Wijlaars

Dancing cocks (that's male chickens, cheeky) in tight speedos fighting over a scantily clad egg might not be the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about PhD theses. However, that just about describes this year's winner of Science magazine's Dance Your PhD contest...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
20 January 2011 • 1 minute read

UK Department of Health publishes letter on IVF funding

by Dr Christopher Chatterton

Over the last few months BioNews has covered the developing story that a number of PCTs across England have suspended their fertility services, citing financial constraints as a prominent factor....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
30 July 2010 • 5 minutes read

Why the MRC did not fund the first test-tube baby

by Professor Sarah Franklin and 2 others

In 1971, reproductive biologist Dr Robert Edwards and gynaecologist Mr Patrick Steptoe applied to the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) requesting funding for research into human in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer. Their application was rejected...

PET BioNews
Comment
27 July 2009 • 4 minutes read

The Press, Public Debate and the Public Understanding of Ethics

by Ben Jones

Many of the developments in the biosciences reported on in BioNews involve novel moral issues or further complicate existing ethical debates. While concerns about the efficacy or safety of a new therapy inevitably lead to calls for further action within the scientific community - more research, bigger studies, better analysis - ethical worries instead result in calls for non-specialist external validation, consultation exercises, public debate and engagement. While the public are put i

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
18 June 2009 • 4 minutes read

IVF funding in the UK: three years on and the waiting continues

by Clare Lewis-Jones MBE

It is now been an incredibly long three years since the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) published the clinical guideline on fertility. It is also an incredibly long two years since all Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) should have made at least one cycle of in vitro...

PET BioNews
Comment
18 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

Is Britain really so anti-science?

by Juliet Tizzard

Those who so often worry that the British public feel nothing but animosity towards science may be breathing a huge sigh of relief this week. News last week that one of the 23 chromosomes in the human genome had been entirely mapped was met with almost universal good feeling. Those...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Book Review: Altruism Reconsidered - Exploring New Approaches to Property in Human Tissue

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
20 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Documentary Review: Our Father

20 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: How Far Could Genome Editing Go?

13 June 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Happy Mum Happy Baby – Tom Daley

13 June 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: The Outlook – The shocking truth about my three dads

23 May 2022 • 4 minutes read

Documentary Review: Freezing Fertility

1 August 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Stories of Our Times – IVF, fraud and 'unwanted' children

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: DNA Family Secrets – series two, episode six

18 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: Spotlight – The babymaker uncovered

11 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: DNA Family Secrets – series two, episode three

4 July 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Biohacked Family Secrets – The birth of the sperm bank

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856