PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentWhose sperm is it anyway?

BioNews

Whose sperm is it anyway?

Published 1 October 2012 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 675

Author

Dr Anna Smajdor

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).

A woman whose husband became a sperm donor without her knowledge is seeking to change the law. Her claim is that a husband's sperm constitutes a 'marital asset', over which a wife should have some legally enforcable rights...

A woman whose husband became a sperm donor without her
knowledge is seeking to change the law (reported in BioNews 671). Her claim is
that a husband's sperm constitutes a 'marital asset', over which a wife should
have some legally enforcable rights.

Currently, there is no legal requirement for a spouse to
consent to her partner's sperm donation. But perhaps there should be? After
all, marriage is usually understood to entail a degree of shared
decision-making. And since begetting children - with one's spouse - is
traditionally a primary reason for tying the knot, can it really be compatible
with marital mores for husbands to conceive children with other people?

Expectations of marriage have evolved over the centuries.
And the legal rights and obligations associated with marriage have changed
accordingly. Spouses may no longer be certain just what is entailed by the marital
bond. If you marry someone, have you automatically agreed to allow them
unlimited access to your bank account? Have you by default committed yourself
to having sex with them on demand?

For English women, the answer to these questions used to be straightforwardly
yes. Once married, a woman's property became that of her husband. After several
decades of legal wrangling, the Married Women's Property Act of 1882 ended
this, revolutionising the social and financial position of women and paving the
way for female suffrage. The whole purpose of this Act was to ensure that
merely being married does not automatically transform an individual's possessions
into 'marital assets'.

Still more strikingly, in the past, a woman's body was
regarded as the property of her husband. Accordingly, there was no legal
recognition of the crime of rape if the victim was the perpetrator's wife. In
consenting to marriage, a woman forfeited any right to object to her husband's
sexual demands. In essence, her body and her reproductive functions were
marital assets — and therefore under the control of her husband. The law
relating to this was changed only in 1991 in the UK, to allow for prosecution
of men who rape their wives.

Women have reason to feel glad that the law has changed on
these issues. Marriage no longer constitutes legal ownership, whether of the
spouse's body, or their property. A wife may feel that her husband should not
donate sperm without her agreement. And her concern may be morally justifiable,
if not legally so. But the language of ownership and assets in this context
invokes an ugly history. The law is at best a blunt tool for enforcing the
delicate nuances in personal relationships. This being so, there are a number
of crucial reasons for being very cautious about arguing for legal restrictions
on one's spouse's freedom.

The first consideration is that morality and law are not
identical. There are some things which many — or even all — people would agree
are immoral in the context of marriage: adultery, for example. Should the law insist
that the wife's consent is obtained before a husband has sex with another
woman? If the wife's consent is not obtained, should adultery be prosecuted as
a crime, rather than simply frowned upon as a vice?

The freedom - within certain limits - to behave immorally is
protected in our society and this extends to marriage. One reason for this is
that people have different ideas about what constitutes immoral behaviour. Perhaps
some wives would think it perfectly reasonable for their husbands to donate
sperm. Within the context of different relationships, different sorts of
behaviour are acceptable. Trying to enforce a uniform standard through legal
proscriptions would be both dangerous and foolish.

Another reason for being reluctant to apply legal
restrictions over a husband's activities is the necessity for even-handedness
in the law. A wife who seeks to prevent her husband from disposing of his
tissue without her consent may want to think about whether she would wish her
husband to exercise similar rights over her. If a wife must give consent before
her husband can donate sperm, must a husband
give consent before his wife gets pregnant? Or cuts her hair? Or donates blood?

Of course spouses who respect and care for one another will
hesitate before taking action that will distress their loved one. A man who
donates sperm with no consideration for his wife's feelings may be a bad
husband. But equally, perhaps, a woman who seeks legal control or ownership of her
husband's tissue is a bad wife. What should the law do when confronted with bad
husbands and wives? The answer, in my view, is 'nothing'.

Relationships are the moral
responsibility of those who engage in them. The changes that have been fought
for, and attained, in marriage, entail a greater degree of freedom and flexibility
than in the past. People choose their spouses, and negotiate the terms of their
relationships according to their values and beliefs. Sometimes they choose
badly, or their negotiations founder. In such cases, they have another option
that was not available to married couples in the past: divorce.

Related Articles

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
News
28 March 2013 • 2 minutes read

One woman's campaign: spousal consent for sperm donation

by Dr Vikki Burchell

A woman has called for legal changes to prevent a man from donating his sperm without his wife's consent....

Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
News
17 January 2013 • 2 minutes read

'Stolen' sperm spawns twins, lawsuit

by Jess Ware

A man is suing a US fertility clinic in negligence for 'mental and economic injuries' after alleging it used his 'stolen' sperm to impregnate his girlfriend without his consent....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
29 October 2012 • 3 minutes read

Not in front of the children!

by Dr Gillian Lockwood

The recent case in which a woman called for legal changes to prevent men from donating sperm without their wife's consent has already drawn interesting responses. However, debates about whether gametes may be regarded as 'marital assets' fail to capture the essence of the woman's sense of injustice. The whole point is 'What do we tell the children?'...

Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
Comment
15 October 2012 • 3 minutes read

Whose family is it anyway?

by Dr Stevie de Saille

In 'Whose Sperm is it Anyway?', Dr Anna Smajdor writes that the law should not be changed to require spousal consent for the donation of sperm. While I do not disagree with this assertion, we should perhaps not be so quick to dismiss the claim for gametes as 'marital assets' solely because of the terms upon which it is based...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
4 October 2012 • 3 minutes read

Consent and coercion in gamete and embryo donation

by Dr Neil Manson

The donation of gametes and embryos must be done with the consent of the donor, otherwise important rights are breached. Valid consent must be voluntary and coercion can undermine voluntariness. But how is coercion defined? Coercion is where one or more parties force another party to act in a way that the coercing party desires, which means that it shares something with offers, incentives and persuasion, but differs by relying on the power of a credible threat....

Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
Image by Dr Christina Weis. © Christina Weis
News
24 September 2012 • 1 minute read

End of legal wrangle involving lesbian parents, private sperm donor and surrogate mother

by Tom Barrow

The High Court has awarded a lesbian couple sole custody rights for a child conceived using donor sperm and a surrogate's egg after a three-year battle over parenthood...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts equipment used for embryo biopsy.
News
9 June 2009 • 2 minutes read

Sperm lawfully obtained from dying man unable to give consent

by Dr Antony Starza-Allen

The parents of an Iowan man on life support and unable to give consent have been made to seek a court declaration that extracting his sperm for his fiancee's future use was lawful. Daniel Christy, 23, was seriously injured in a motorcycle accident and was flown to...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« No 'brownie points' for ill-conceived Donation Review

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Was the Women's Health Strategy worth the wait?

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

Why the UK should extend the 14-day rule to 28 days

25 July 2022 • 5 minutes read

200 Years of Mendel: From Peas to Personalised Medicine

15 August 2022 • 5 minutes read

Same-sex parent should not have been forced to adopt child

15 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: Editing the Human Genome – Where Are We Now? What Happens Next?

8 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Citizenship and same-sex parents – about time, Sweden!

8 August 2022 • 2 minutes read

FILM: 200 Years of Mendel – From Peas to Personalised Medicine

1 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Women's Health Strategy plans reflect rising needs of same-sex female couples

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856