PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsCommentFertility clinics and their patients suffer from HFEA's (lack of) communication strategy

BioNews

Fertility clinics and their patients suffer from HFEA's (lack of) communication strategy

Published 14 November 2011 posted in Comment and appears in BioNews 633

Author

Dr Sue Avery

Former trustee at the Progress Educational Trust
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

The general public has been well informed about the HFEA's proposed changes in compensation for gamete donors. However, there has been no direct communication with licensed centres and no clear indication of when regulations will change. As a result we are having difficulty dealing with a wave of enthusiasm from potential donors...

For those of us engaged in providing treatment for infertility, delivering clear information and managing expectations is a vital part of our activity. The media, on the other hand, has an entirely different set of priorities. Still, thanks to the media, the nation is now aware of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's (HFEA) decision to raise and simplify the current limitations on compensation for gamete donors; egg donors are to receive £750  per cycle and sperm donors £35 per clinic visit.

Compensation for gamete donors, of course, is not a simple issue and there has been considerable debate over the HFEA's new strategy. Such debate should (and doubtlessly will) continue. But from the perspective of a centre struggling to recruit donors, the decision has to be viewed positively.


Many centres have reported an increase in calls from prospective donors — a significant increase, in most cases. In my own centre, the week following the announcement saw as many contacts from potential egg donors as we would normally expect in a year. If we put concerns about donors' motivations aside for a minute, this is very welcome, considering our waiting list.


Dealing with greater numbers of donors requires increased resources, but in the main this is a problem we are happy to have.


There is, however, a further problem which is less welcome. While the general public has been well informed about the changes, there has been no direct communication with licensed centres, and no clear indication of when the regulations will change. As a result we are having difficulty dealing with this wave of enthusiasm.


Yes, we tell potential donors, the system will be changing, but we do not know when. Hence there is a fear that the interest gained by this wave of publicity will be wasted unless details of a timeframe are released very soon. Not only do we need to know the date but in order to maximise the impact of the media coverage, we need the change to take place sooner rather than later, for several reasons.


The first is obvious. The waiting time for patients requiring donated gametes can stretch into years and the sooner we can move to reduce this time, the better. An earlier date would give us the best chance of recruiting those potential donors who contacted us in the wake of the publicity, before their interest wanes.


A third reason only became apparent after the announcement was made. There have been cancellations from egg donors about to start embark on a cycle who now prefer to wait for the regulations to come into effect. This way, they will receive more appropriate compensation.


So the HFEA's reticence to communicate with licensed clinics has implications not only for patients who may wish to receive treatment in the future but also those whose treatment had previously been scheduled, often after a lengthy wait for a donor.


I would therefore like to make a plea for two things: firstly, a coordinated communication strategy so that when announcements like this are made through the press, licensed centres are briefed at the same time. The media coverage gifted us a free recruitment campaign which a briefing to centres with a proposed timeframe could have built upon. Secondly, consideration should be given to expediting the change in regulation — not only for the sake of our waiting patients, but also for those poised on the brink of treatment.


It is the role of the media to spread the word. It is the role of the licensed centres to manage the expectations of patients and donors. With the right guidance a constructive synergy is possible.

Related Articles

Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Bill McConkey via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts sperm swimming towards an egg.
News
8 July 2013 • 2 minutes read

Egg donors mostly motivated by urge to help others

by Siobhan Chan

The majority of egg donors donate for altruistic reasons, although personal benefits such as financial compensation are also a factor, according to a large European study...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
9 January 2013 • 3 minutes read

Perhaps the Government is right to plan to abolish the HFEA

by Walter Merricks

Perhaps the Government is right to plan to abolish the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). The astonishing behaviour of its members at last week's open Authority meeting over compensation for egg and sperm donors will lower its reputation in the eyes of some of its erstwhile supporters. Those who might have manned the barricades to halt the Government's plans may now wonder whether the Care Quality Commission (CQC) — the health and social care regulator set to take over the H...

PET BioNews
News
13 December 2012 • 2 minutes read

Drastic changes to sperm and egg donation policy made by the HFEA

by Sandy Starr

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has decided that donors should be paid fixed sums, and that these sums should be £35 per clinic visit for sperm donors and £750 per cycle of donation for egg donors...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Comment
6 December 2012 • 5 minutes read

If it ain't broke, don't fix it: why the HFEA should leave the gamete donation policy alone

by Dr Kamal Ahuja

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has already made two decisions following its public consultation and review of gamete donation policies in the UK: first, intra-familial gamete donation can continue as before (subject to certain provisions); and second, the number of families which a single donor might help create remains limited to ten. The bigger question on compensation and benefit in kind to donors will not be answered until later this year...

Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family (from Greek and Roman mythology) entwined in coils of DNA.
Image by Bill Sanderson via the Wellcome Collection, © Wellcome Trust Ltd 1990. Depicts Laocoön and his family entwined in coils of DNA (based on the figure of Laocoön from Greek and Roman mythology).
Comment
9 November 2011 • 5 minutes read

Ethical principles and the HFEA's donation review

by Professor Stephen Wilkinson

At a public meeting on 19 October, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) decided to move to a 'flat rate' system of monetary compensation for egg donors. The HFEA also decided to leave the regulations governing egg sharing substantially unchanged. Critics have already raised concerns about the quality of the discussion at the meeting, I want to look at a quite different issue: the use made by the HFEA of the idea of 'ethical principles'...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Ethical principles and the HFEA's donation review

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Recent
27 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Thirty years of PET: our 'Fertility, Genomics and Embryo Research' report

27 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Children's rights and donor conception: What next?

20 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

The problems with lifting donor anonymity earlier

20 June 2022 • 6 minutes read

An adaptive act: How should human fertilisation and embryology legislation respond to scientific and technological change?

13 June 2022 • 1 minute read

A new look for BioNews

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856