PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsReviewsEvent review: Genetic Testing in Assisted Reproduction - Selecting, Not Perfecting?

BioNews

Event review: Genetic Testing in Assisted Reproduction - Selecting, Not Perfecting?

Published 14 October 2013 posted in Reviews and appears in BioNews 726

Author

Dr Jamie Heather

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.

We had almost made it through the speakers when it happened, just before the break. It was the last speaker who did it. It was Dr Joyce Harper who said what I'd been waiting for, and dropped the Gattaca bomb...


Genetic Testing in Assisted Reproduction: Selecting, Not Perfecting?

Organised by the British Library

British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB

Wednesday 9 October 2013

'Genetic Testing in Assisted Reproduction: Selecting, Not Perfecting?', organised by the British Library, Wednesday 9 October 2013


We had almost made it through the speakers when it happened,
just before the break. It was the last speaker who did it. It was Dr Joyce Harper who said what I'd been
waiting for, and dropped the Gattaca bomb.

Gather enough people to talk about embryo selection for long
enough, and comparisons to the cult 1997 film will inevitably be made. So it
was last week, when the British Library held one of their TalkScience events on the subject of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

We had four experts on hand to guide us
through the ins and outs of the technology: Dr Alan Thornhill, Nick
Meade
, Professor
Rosamund Scott
and Dr Harper. Each took to the mic to give a short speech
on a different aspect of PGD, after which the audience were encouraged to get
involved and ask some questions.

PGD uses a range of techniques alongside IVF to allow couples with known heritable diseases to check
their embryos for that condition, preventing them from passing it on to their
children. Drawing on their professional knowledge, the panel filled us in on developments
in technical know-how, legislation, and how demand for PGD is rising.

All told, an enjoyable night was had. The speakers were
engaging, the audience involved, and the talks artfully avoided the temptation
to dumb down. However, despite ethically titillating subject matter, the
discussion fell short of provocative.

I can't help but feel this was inevitable. All the panel -
and apparently half the audience - was professionally involved with PGD on
one level or other and viewed it favourably, leaving little room for genuine
debate. Perhaps the original chair, Dr Tom
Shakespeare
, might have brought some balancing views, but unfortunately he
was ill on the day.

I can't say that I felt hard done by; indeed many of the
views aired were largely in line with my own. Yet I just couldn't shake the
feeling that everyone would have loved a bit of controversy to get their teeth
in to.

Attempts were made: the possibility of PGD fuelling a
eugenics revival, and the emergence of designer babies were both raised, but summarily
shot down. That they were brought up was largely by dint of the panel straining
to give time to opposing viewpoints; that the views failed to get much mileage
seemed to show that no-one present actually held them!

While all of the speakers gave interesting talks, two of
them particularly stood out for me.

The first was for purely nerdy reasons. Dr Harper explored
some of the technologies PGD uses to test embryos, which overlap slightly with
my own research in its use of high-throughput DNA sequencing. I know such
techno-talk isn't always received well by a crowd, but there was at least one person
that night that enjoyed it.

The second was Nick Meade, who brought some real-life case
studies of families who have undergone PGD. These genuine human stories opened
a window into the lives of people who seek PGD, providing a unique insight.

One woman, speaking of her husband who suffered from a rare
heart condition
, told how 'he didn't want a child to have to go through what he had been
through'. Another
family whose first child was born with a progressive
muscle-wasting disease
revealed that PGD offered a way to protect themselves from 'further heartache'.

While debate might have been a little thinner on the ground
than advertised, I don't have it in me to complain. Complex biology was
communicated, delicate ethical and legal issues were broached (science fiction
references aside) and most importantly, I came out knowing more than when I
went in.

While a few of us in the audience might have
felt some
topic
or
other
might have been covered a little better, most of the crowd seemed satisfied
come the end of the night (although if it was true that half of them were
actually PGD practitioners, maybe that's no surprise).

Related Articles

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Reviews
7 December 2015 • 5 minutes read

TV Review: Jodie Marsh is Making Babies

by Dr Lone Hørlyck

This documentary shows that assisted reproduction is a huge and real business. Unfortunately, it does so without asking the necessary critical and ethical questions that would make it genuinely worth watching...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
News
6 July 2015 • 2 minutes read

Switzerland votes for PGD

by Kirsty Oswald

In a national referendum, a majority of Swiss voters have supported allowing preimplantation genetic diagnosis to screen for genetic diseases...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
20 April 2015 • 4 minutes read

Book Review: From Bench to Bedside, to Track and Field

by Ross Cloney

The image of eugenics often portrayed in the media is reminiscent of the horrors of the early to middle 20th century. Legions of identical blond-haired, blue-eyed ubermenschen, backed by an authoritarian state with no room for diversity or difference. In 'From Bench to Bedside, to Track and Field: the context of enhancement and its ethical relevance', Silvia Camporesi demolishes that image...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
13 February 2015 • 2 minutes read

Whole-genome sequencing detects de novo mutations in embryos

by Nina Chohan

Scientists have shown for the first time that whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in IVF embryos can detect 'de novo' mutations...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Comment
8 December 2014 • 5 minutes read

Commercialisation and the moral obligation to create 'designer' babies

by Professor John Galloway

Although the word was not actually used (or at least I did not hear it), this was a polemic making the case for 'eugenics'...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
9 September 2013 • 4 minutes read

Report Review: Eugenics and the Ethics of Selective Reproduction

by Dr Anna Smajdor

The prospect of eugenics has re-emerged in multiple new guises. The polarising power of this concept is part of its fascination, but this is not necessarily fruitful for debate or policy-making. In their booklet, Stephen Wilkinson and Eve Garrard address this problem...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Comment
20 May 2013 • 3 minutes read

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the welfare of the healthy selected child

by Dr Mair Crouch

Preimplanatation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a technique that allows couples from families with history of certain inheritable diseases to try and reduce their risk of having a child affected by the condition....

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
13 March 2013 • 2 minutes read

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer risk during IVF is feasible, study indicates

by Sarah Pritchard

It is now scientifically feasible to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) during IVF to screen embryos for genes associated with high cancer risk, scientists say...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Comment
18 February 2013 • 5 minutes read

Policing preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients first please

by Professor Alan Handyside and 3 others

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority recently announced plans to review the list of approved inherited conditions for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis is currently licensed to ensure that it is only available for conditions which meet the statutory requirements in the UK...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« TV Review: House of Surrogates

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.

Find out how you can advertise here
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Popular
  • Recent
1 August 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Stories of Our Times – IVF, fraud and 'unwanted' children

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: DNA Family Secrets – series two, episode six

18 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: Spotlight – The babymaker uncovered

4 July 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Biohacked Family Secrets – The birth of the sperm bank

20 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Documentary Review: Our Father

8 August 2022 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: Babbage – Editing the code of life

1 August 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Stories of Our Times – IVF, fraud and 'unwanted' children

25 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: DNA Family Secrets – series two, episode six

18 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: Spotlight – The babymaker uncovered

11 July 2022 • 4 minutes read

TV Review: DNA Family Secrets – series two, episode three

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856