PET PET
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
Become a Friend Donate
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
    • People
    • Press Office
    • Our History
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Friend of PET
    • Volunteer
    • Campaigns
    • Writing Scheme
    • Partnership and Sponsorship
    • Advertise with Us
  • Donate
    • Become a Friend of PET
  • BioNews
    • News
    • Comment
    • Reviews
    • Elsewhere
    • Topics
    • Glossary
    • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Previous Events
  • Engagement
    • Policy and Projects
      • Resources
    • Education
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements
PETBioNewsReviewsRadio Review: The Moral Maze - Genetics and Education

BioNews

Radio Review: The Moral Maze - Genetics and Education

Published 9 December 2013 posted in Reviews and appears in BioNews 729

Author

Matthew Thomas

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.

Underlying the genetics of intelligence debate is our strong attachment to the idea of 'potential' and freedom to fulfil it. This blank slate approach to achievement is seductive, but is it based in fact?...


The Moral Maze: Genetics and Education

BBC Radio 4, Wednesday 30 October 2013

Presented by Michael Buerk

'The Moral Maze: Genetics and Education', BBC Radio 4, Wednesday 30 October 2013


Dare to mention gene in the same breath as intelligence and
somebody is bound to accuse you of 'eugenics' and where can you go from there,
you monster?

The outgoing special adviser to Education Secretary Michael
Gove, Dominic Cummings, wrote an essay aimed, he said, at '15 to 25-year-olds
and those interested in more ambitious education […] for them'. The essay outlines
Cummings' vision for an 'Odyssean' style of education, synthesising maths and science
with humanities and arts. The 237-page 'leaked' essay sparked widespread media
attention, anger and misreporting. (As the 15 to 25-year-olds say: TL;DR.)

Michael Buerk, host of Radio 4's Moral Maze, pointed out it
wasn't the 'sometimes excoriating analysis of what's wrong with the education
system' that caused a kerfuffle; rather, Cummings dared to mention research
showing that genetics affects general cognitive ability — what we call intelligence
(see BioNews 727).

This was always gearing up to be a fun episode. I'm not a
regular listener (perhaps because I'm not a regular user of morality) but I'm
certainly going to tune in more often if they're all this spicy. With all the
shouting, the factionalism, the conflict of ideology with fact, and even a spot
of slander, it's like Eastenders set in the Vienna Circle.

The Maze wound through many twisty subjects that I can't
hope to cover here: educational streaming of children; elitism; eugenics; how
scientific knowledge informs policy; transhumanism and eroding our biological
limitations; and much more. You should give it a listen.

The format goes a little like this. Buerk chairs a panel formed
this week of ex-MP-turned-pundit Michael Portillo, Chief Executive of the RSA Matthew
Taylor
, priest-journalist Giles Fraser and Daily Mail columnist Melanie
Phillips
. The panelists question a series of 'witnesses': Dr Kathryn Asbury,
who co-wrote the book 'G is for Genes'; Steve Davy, a teacher at the Wroxham 'listening'
school in Hertfordshire, UK; Dr Anders Sandberg, from the 'Future of Humanity
Institute' at Oxford University; and Dr David King, founder and director of
the Human Genetics Alert campaign group.

(I'll admit I was looking forward to writing an extended snark
about Melanie Phillips. Alas, she was mostly harmless despite her apparent
position of choosing not to believe in 'heritability of intelligence' research.
The climate change denier isn't exactly renowned for her rigour, though. As the 15
to 25-year-olds say: Whatevs.)

Dr King of Human Genetics Alert stole the
show with his nasty, slanderous attacks on Professor Robert Plomin and the
field of behavioural genetics. King said Plomin has 'dirty hands' and works in
a field of 'very unpleasant people'. He even not-too-subtly suggested that
Plomin hasn't 'dissociated' himself from the field's historically 'right wing' and
'racist' people.

Putting aside King's apparent personal beef, there is a more
problematic philosophical point. King tacitly forwards the argument that it's
fine to apply genetics research to physical issues such as health but not
social issues such as intelligence. The application of knowledge doesn't work
like that, and nor should it. The panel nicely disposed of his arguments.

Underlying the genetics of intelligence debate is our strong
attachment to the idea of 'potential' and freedom to fulfil it. Just look at
the runaway success of 'Outliers', Malcolm Gladwell's book about — to simplify
— how we all hold the potential for genius given some luck and 10,000 hours of
deliberate practice. This blank slate approach to achievement is seductive, but is it based in fact?

Ten thousand hours is a simple number, a simple heuristic. IQ,
on the other hand, is a slippery concept. IQ emerges from a statistical method
(known as factor analysis) that looks for patterns in how measures such as test
results vary together. The same method decides your Big Five Personality Traits
or your Myers-Brigg Type. Measuring intelligence is not at all like measuring time.

Similarly, the folk understanding of heritability is pretty wonky.
Heritability measures how much variation in a population is due to genetic
variation
— in this case, how much of the variability in IQ test scores or exam
results can be explained by the amount of genetic variation among test takers.
Heritability does not tell us how much of a person's test scores are down to
their genes.

Dr Asbury's book includes recommendations for what they call
'genetically sensitive' schooling. I fail to understand how one can move from population-level
estimates of heritability to policies that benefit individual children. But I
haven't read the book and Asbury didn't explain this so well on the show.
Regardless, Asbury came across as sincere and egalitarian in her opinions about
personalised learning. Unfortunately, voices like hers might get lost under all
the shouting.

Michael Portillo summed up the debate as being about 'the
confrontation of science with political prejudice'. As the 15 to 25-year-olds say:
Totes.

Related Articles

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
News
15 May 2017 • 2 minutes read

GCSE scores more nature than nurture, says study

by Chris Baldacci

Researchers may have finally settled the question of which matters more for a child's development - nature or nurture; and nature appears to be the winner, according to a study looking at GCSE scores...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
6 June 2016 • 4 minutes read

Radio Review: Dangerous Visions - Produce

by Kriss Fearon

'Produce' is an intriguing and believable portrayal of how parents might act when faced with the chance to decide what genes to give to their future child...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
News
24 July 2015 • 2 minutes read

Academic performance strongly influenced by genes

by Dr Charlotte Warren-Gash

The educational achievement of British teenagers is highly heritable across a range of academic subjects, according to researchers at King's College London...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
News
15 June 2015 • 2 minutes read

Academic performance not affected by assisted reproduction

by Ayala Ochert

The academic performance of teenagers who were conceived through assisted reproductive technologies is the same as that of their peers, according to Danish doctors...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
20 April 2015 • 4 minutes read

Book Review: From Bench to Bedside, to Track and Field

by Ross Cloney

The image of eugenics often portrayed in the media is reminiscent of the horrors of the early to middle 20th century. Legions of identical blond-haired, blue-eyed ubermenschen, backed by an authoritarian state with no room for diversity or difference. In 'From Bench to Bedside, to Track and Field: the context of enhancement and its ethical relevance', Silvia Camporesi demolishes that image...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Reviews
9 December 2013 • 4 minutes read

Event Review: The Good, the Bad and the Genetically Predetermined

by Simon Hazelwood-Smith

At this Royal Institution discussion examining the role that genetics can play in our justice systems, all speakers were in broad agreement with one another...

Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the output from a DNA sequencing machine.
CC BY 4.0
Image by Peter Artymiuk via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts the shadow of a DNA double helix, on a background that shows the fluorescent banding of the sequencing output from an automated DNA sequencing machine.
Comment
28 October 2013 • 3 minutes read

Back to school - using genetics to personalise education

by Dr John Gillott

Dominic Cummings and Robert Plomin are claiming a great deal about the effect of genetics on intelligence, some of which is sound, some of which is not and some of which is very speculative...

PET BioNews
News
21 October 2013 • 2 minutes read

Outcry over government adviser's claim that educational achievement is genetic

by Sandy Starr

An adviser to the UK Government has provoked an outcry by arguing that there is a significant genetic basis for children's educational achievement...

Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
CC0 1.0
Image by Alan Handyside via the Wellcome Collection. Depicts a human egg soon after fertilisation, with the two parental pronuclei clearly visible.
Reviews
5 February 2013 • 4 minutes read

Radio Review: Moral Maze

by Dr Gabby Samuel

'IVF doctors to raffle human egg' ran the Sunday Times headline on 14 March 2010. A seminar sponsored by an American clinic took place in London at which a human egg and a cycle of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment was awarded to one couple who attended...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« Exhibition Review: Foreign Bodies, Common Ground

Data-Label The UK's Leading Supplier Of Medical Labels & Asset Labels

RetiringDentist.co.uk The UK's Leading M&A Company.
easyfundraising
amazon

This month in BioNews

  • Recent
4 July 2022 • 3 minutes read

Podcast Review: Biohacked Family Secrets – The birth of the sperm bank

4 July 2022 • 3 minutes read

Book Review: Why DNA? – From DNA sequence to biological complexity

27 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: Genetics Unzipped – Have a heart, the science of xenotransplantation

20 June 2022 • 5 minutes read

Documentary Review: Our Father

20 June 2022 • 4 minutes read

Podcast Review: How Far Could Genome Editing Go?

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856

Subscribe to BioNews and other PET updates for free.

Subscribe
PET PET

PET is an independent charity that improves choices for people affected by infertility and genetic conditions.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS
Wellcome
Website redevelopment supported by Wellcome.

Navigation

  • About Us
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • BioNews
  • Events
  • Engagement
  • Jobs & Opportunities
  • Contact Us

BioNews

  • News
  • Comment
  • Reviews
  • Elsewhere
  • Topics
  • Glossary
  • Newsletters

Other

  • My Account
  • Subscribe

Website by Impact Media Impact Media

  • Privacy Statement
  • Advertising Policy
  • Thanks and Acknowledgements

© 1992 - 2022 Progress Educational Trust. All rights reserved.

Limited company registered in England and Wales no 07405980 • Registered charity no 1139856